You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Anti-Phishing Proposed Solution
(edited)
The devil is in the details. You haven't responded when I asked how rep can be gamed in this use case. You have neither addressed how using stake can be gamed in this use case when I point out ways that can happen. What is the real reason you are adamantly insisting on using stake as a metric rather than rep?
You insist on using a metric that will enable more centralization of power regarding phishing attacks on Hive, while trying to claim using rep won't work, that is not supported by facts. You don't lack debating skills, you lack factual basis for this insistence on stake instead of rep. Why?
0.00000000 BEE
What's there to explain? You are well aware that phishing is related to hacking, 70+ reputation 4+ accounts are spamming liquidity is low on hive. They r more likely hacked. You have seen dapps losing all their user keys in one attack. Thousands of accounts gone to hackers. I won't name a dapp as I am adviced to not mention the specific incident.
Where ever you look, rep system of 250+ is broken because I can imagine the accounts who have 70+ reputation and are anti hive. Once they decline rewards, it can't be reduced further so we would be stuck with bad actors.
To answer your why, u r known as someone who rarely sees other person's perspective of the world. Before u jumped in this comment section, your reputation of not able to see other's perspective was here before u.
I am not interested to convince you or put effort to convince you, as I already reached a conclusion that it's waste of my energy and efforts.
Sorry, it u don't like what I wrote but I hope it answers your why.