You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Anti-Phishing Proposed Solution
The purpose of the post above was to spark a debate regarding anti-phishing solutions at the frontend level. If you suggest that these solutions should be reputation-based, I do not have a problem with that ATM. Currently, we need frontends to consider the fact that implementing anti-phishing measures at the frontend level will not kill the spirit of decentralization.
I see some flaws in the reputation system, but I either do not want to debate them or I am not a skilled enough debater regarding that specific point at the moment.
Since both you and I agree that frontends should take action, let us keep pushing this narrative so we can lower the phishing rate.
Thanks for understanding!
@valued-customer
The devil is in the details. You haven't responded when I asked how rep can be gamed in this use case. You have neither addressed how using stake can be gamed in this use case when I point out ways that can happen. What is the real reason you are adamantly insisting on using stake as a metric rather than rep?
You insist on using a metric that will enable more centralization of power regarding phishing attacks on Hive, while trying to claim using rep won't work, that is not supported by facts. You don't lack debating skills, you lack factual basis for this insistence on stake instead of rep. Why?
View more