That was delicious

image.png

We got the all the important three points in a game that i genuinely thought was petering out to a draw Alas, it is once again a reminder that you can never take your foot off the pedal against Arsenal because we keep going until the final whistle.

@deniskj and other sore Manchester United fans will try to make it about the officiating but the reality is that we simply won the mental battle. On the balance of play, there probably wasn't much to separate both teams. since we both created some decent chances along the way.

Our buildup was typically more fluid than theirs but this time, Manchester United offered a different type of threat because we let them have the ball. Unlike previous matches where we would simply press high and squeeze them into long passes, we let them have the ball in their half while ensuring a low enough block to stifle the threat on the flanks.

Our tactics worked quite well for most of the first half as United scored with their only attempt in the half. In the second half, the game was a bit more open with chances coming at both ends.

Rashford's goal sparked something in Arsenal and we responded almost immediately through Odegard. However, the goal was from a sublime team move that split the United's defence apart.

In the second half, Rashford had a chance to put United ahead but that was blocked by Saliba while Saka had a clean strike on goal that he ended up hitting tamely to Onana.

We had a penalty that I believe was rightly ruled out because there was very little contact. However, it is rather strange that it was ruled out because many other penalties are given for that same situation.

Eddie Nketiah's head was almost taken off by Lindelof but the United defender got a yellow card. Some would argue that he was the last line and should have been sent off.

The reason I'm pointing out the decisions that didn't go Arsenal's way is because United fans are trying to make it about the ref and not about the fact that they simply couldn't handle us for the whole match. They also have a terrible bench and their recruitment has been questionable.

RICE RICE BABY

Ah yes, the crowning moment of the day was Declan Rice opening his account today. What a time to do it and what an immense player he is.

I recall that during the preseason, Arsenal played this Midfield three of Rice, Odegard and Havertz but it didn't pan out quite well. It was a disjointed team that looked rusty but those issues are slowly being ironed out.

Kai Havertz is probably the only one that didn't shine in the match but he also didn't have a bad game either. He's still void of confidence but there's a baller in there and with each passing game, he gets closer.

Today, we saw Havertz take up numerous dangerous attacking positions and on a different day, he could have grabbed the opener. It wasn't to be today but I tell you, it's getting close to Kai time.

I think he just needs to keep playing until the rust falls off. Kai will be decisive for us this season and luckily, he has the full backing of the manager.

The blow is the absence of Thomas Partey but you'd have hardly noticed such an important player is missing the way we played today. Hopefully, his injury isn't long term but even if it is, we have Jorginho as cover and I reckon we'll be fine. Until we meet again, up the Arsenal.



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

We had a penalty that I believe was rightly ruled out because there was very little contact. However, it is rather strange that it was ruled out because many other penalties are given for that same situation.

Do you really have to contradict yourself? Their is nothing like "a rightly ruled out penalty." Was there contact? No. Havertz should've been booked for diving!

Some would argue that he was the last line and should have been sent off.

Those 'some' clearly knows nothing about officiating rules then.

Celebrate your win, don't dabble wrongly into officiating decisions out of emotion.

0
0
0.000
avatar

All I'm saying is that how many others have you seen get booked in that same situation that Havertz was in? Shouldn't officiating be consistent?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Officiating will never be consistent because referees are human beings operating under different conditions. Immediately Havertz hit the deck I concluded it was a penalty. After further reviews, it was glaring no contact was made. What's the penalty for a player who went to ground in the box without contact? Yellow card for simulation.

I remember telling the guy sitting next to me that if Ashley Young was in that position, he will stretch out his leg to tangle with that of Bissaka. Truth is Havertz expected a tackle, and he hit the deck hoping the tackle will come. He should've been carded for simulation but the referee was still smarting from having to overturn his wrong decision that he forgot about the right process.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My publication was pointing out the fact that officiating is inconsistent. Rules are supposed to be enforced consistently but in football they aren't.

That's also why I pointed out the hypocrisy in Man United fans of all people whining about referee decisions. I was further pointing out that if anything, the officiating in this match was consistent for both teams because they equally have a bone to pick about something that officials did.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My publication was pointing out the fact that officiating is inconsistent. Rules are supposed to be enforced consistently but in football they aren't.

The rules are clear, but they are also technical. That means interpretation will be different based on referee's technical competence. That's why some referees in their 30s are yet to officiate an EPL match while Michael Oliver did it in his twenties.

That's also why I pointed out the hypocrisy in Man United fans of all people whining about referee decisions.

What's with the hypocrisy about Man United fans and referee decisions? I'm a United fans and I always tell people referees make mistakes. Even at the time when everyone was making noise about United being favoured, every single match being played in EPL back then had one referee error or the other. Was Ferguson's United playing those games too? But it's comfortable to claim United were more favoured because they were above others back then, just like it was comfortable for selling teams to quote United higher price for players because they used to be richer.

Like I always said, it will eventually even out. Every team will get their airy moments with the referee. So also, they will also get lucky at one point or the other.

For the match against Arsenal, the referee did well. The fact that I did not remember who the referee was shows how excellent his performance was. Referees are not supposed to dominate a match, if they do something definitely went wrong. I'll definitely remember his name if he made a glaring error. Arsenal won because it's their day, and I was actually surprised because I expected them to win more convincingly.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @arsenal4life! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You distributed more than 15000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 16000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

LEO Power Up Day - September 15, 2023
The countdown to HiveFest⁸ is two weeks away - Join us and get your exclusive badge!
0
0
0.000