I agree we are doing this to make album covers as part of a mixed media project, using AI as only part of the process that will include photography and drawing on top, will be interesting how it comes out!
It can be a replacement for some stock art. I see a lot of people who are really against all the 'AI' image and text generation, but it's not going away and will only improve. There are issues about the energy it uses.
As someone said, I don't want machines to make art so I can do the dishes and ironing. It should be the other way around.
I have written a few books in the past and always had a problem coming up with good images ( I can't draw!). With the advent of AI I thought, "Aha! Problem solved". Then I started reading about copyright issues. Apparently, AI generators use a vast library of existing images to 'create' an 'original' image. See here, from Harvard Business Review.
I still think I can use generative art, but I would probably have to make it my own...modify the AI image so that is it uniquely mine. I guess :)
Have to learn more about it. Such a tempting opportunity. After all, the images I will provide will not be the essential part of the book. That would be my writing. They would just augment my prose, so I don't think they would take away from the fact that the book would be my own work. This would be a lot like what you are planning to do with the covers, I think. AI isn't making your music. It's just dressing.
Ye I hear what you are saying. I think using it as part of a mixed medium art piece is the thing, if you feed it your own images then they are yours....then playing with it later means it is just another tool. AI generation of art or music or film...well thats a whole new ball game!
These tools are interesting, but they still can't replace an artist if you want really specific results. I assume that's a local view for you.
I agree we are doing this to make album covers as part of a mixed media project, using AI as only part of the process that will include photography and drawing on top, will be interesting how it comes out!
It can be a replacement for some stock art. I see a lot of people who are really against all the 'AI' image and text generation, but it's not going away and will only improve. There are issues about the energy it uses.
As someone said, I don't want machines to make art so I can do the dishes and ironing. It should be the other way around.
View more
Nice! I love playing with AI art, it's a blast. Great job!
!BBH
@stickupboys! Your Content Is Awesome so I just sent 1 $BBH (Bitcoin Backed Hive) to your account on behalf of @thebighigg. (6/50)
It is definitely fun and also an art form to get what you want!
I have written a few books in the past and always had a problem coming up with good images ( I can't draw!). With the advent of AI I thought, "Aha! Problem solved". Then I started reading about copyright issues. Apparently, AI generators use a vast library of existing images to 'create' an 'original' image. See here, from Harvard Business Review.
I still think I can use generative art, but I would probably have to make it my own...modify the AI image so that is it uniquely mine. I guess :)
Have to learn more about it. Such a tempting opportunity. After all, the images I will provide will not be the essential part of the book. That would be my writing. They would just augment my prose, so I don't think they would take away from the fact that the book would be my own work. This would be a lot like what you are planning to do with the covers, I think. AI isn't making your music. It's just dressing.
Ye I hear what you are saying. I think using it as part of a mixed medium art piece is the thing, if you feed it your own images then they are yours....then playing with it later means it is just another tool. AI generation of art or music or film...well thats a whole new ball game!