Soviet Alyosha Monument in Bugas, Bulgaria (Photo gallery)

(edited)

Im Stadtzentrum von Burgas gibt es immer noch einige sovietische Gebäude und Denkmäler.

Zentral sichtbar ist die Alyosha-Statue, die an die Befreiung Bulgariens durch die sovietische Armee im zweiten Weltkrieg gedenken soll.

Die Aufschrift ist nicht mehr gut lesbar und lautet "вечна признателност", was übersetzt ewige Dankbarkeit, Anerkennung bedeutet.

Aloyasha Skurlatov, das Vorbild für die Statue, war übrigens ein Soldat der 3. Ukrainischen Front der Roten Armee in der Ukraine.

Seit dem Ukraine-Krieg gibt es im NATO-Land Bulgarien auch neue Bestrebungen die verbliebenen Soviet-Denkmäler zu beseitigen.

In Sofia wurde mit einem vorgeschobenen Argument und unter Protesten das Denkmal der Roten Armee entfernt. Es würde verfallen und wäre nicht mehr sicher. In Burgas hingegen, sind sie noch allgegenwärtig.

Was sagt ihr dazu? Denkt ihr, man sollte historische Denkmäler entfernen oder bewahren?


Soviet Army Monument "Альоша" (Alyosha) in Burgas, Bulgaria

English

There are still several Soviet buildings and monuments in the city center of Burgas in Bulgaria.

Centrally visible is the Alyosha statue, which commemorates the liberation of Bulgaria by the Soviet army during the Second World War.

The inscription is no longer well legible and reads “вечна признателност”, which translates as eternal gratitude, recognition.

Incidentally, Aloyasha Skurlatov, the model for the statue, was a soldier of the 3rd Ukrainian Front of the Red Army in Ukraine.

Since the war in Ukraine, there have also been new efforts to remove the remaining Soviet monuments in the NATO country of Bulgaria.

In Sofia, the Red Army monument was removed with a pretextual argument and amid protests. It would fall into disrepair and would no longer be safe. In Burgas, on the other hand, they still stand.

What do you think? Do you think historical monuments should be removed or preserved?

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

1.52765330 BEE
17 comments

I think they should be preserved no matter which side it is. It's a part of history and you can always use it to teach what isn't great. Destroying or removing it doesn't seem to help much.

0.00319814 BEE
(edited)

Da gefällt mir das am Schwarzenbergplatz eindeutig besser.
Natürlich sollten sie bewahrt werden für zuküntige Generationen.

0.00324327 BEE

Monuments are to be preserved if its historical background is a thing of pride and joy but if it's all about pain and bloodshed, it's not worth preserving.

0.00323011 BEE

In Burgas und am Sonnenstrand war ich auch mal, ist aber schon eine zeitlang her.
!BEER

0.00320977 BEE
(edited)

Monuments should always remain, history can't be canceled

Have a !PIZZA

0.00319980 BEE

Nur dumme Leute versuchen die Vergangenheit zu ändern. Das gilt auch für Denkmäler.

0.00320054 BEE

This post was curated by dimascastillo90 from the Visual Shots Team | Be part of our Curation Trail - Delegations are Welcome

0.00322161 BEE

Bewahren! Wenn wir alles zerstören, lässt sich die Vergangenheit noch mehr fälschen und verwischen.

0.00322472 BEE

Definitely the old monuments should be preserved!

0.00317058 BEE

The artist created this sculpture to pay tribute to the army

0E-8 BEE

Congratulations @vikisecrets! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You got more than 40000 replies.
Your next target is to reach 40500 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

0E-8 BEE

These are beautiful views that is worth to be admired. With so much beauty

0E-8 BEE

These looks very powerful and storyfull

0E-8 BEE

Maybe the artist was in the army
This statue looks very nice

0E-8 BEE