Added More LEO in the Maya-side Liquidity Pool
After staking my monthly 200 LEO on LPUD, my focus shifts to adding LEO to liquidity pools.
Since I started early adding LEO to the SWAP.HIVE-LEO pool, I don't feel the need to increase this share for the time being. Therefore, I've been focusing on adding LEO to the Maya side, in the LEO-CACAO pool.
They are not big amounts (well, they are based on my LEO earnings), but this is the 3rd time I added small amounts to the pool.
Not everything went 100% smoothly, but in this post you can see how you can overcome some potential issues that may arise when working with DEXes...
As I mentioned in one of my previous posts, there is a great advantage to having transactions happen in your own wallet instead of custodial wallets. You can switch interfaces if something doesn't work properly in one of them and continue in another. You will see this exemplified in this post. The counter example would be to have HIVE in a CEX for example, and have the CEX disable HIVE transactions for no apparent reason or an expected time of resolution. And discretionary decisions by CEXes happened in the past and will happen again.
Preparations
If you never used LeoDex or DEXes in general, I advise you to not start without checking out the tutorials.
What was the process I went through?
Transfer Hive-Engine LEO to Arbitrum LEO
That is done via the wleo.io tool, by choosing aLEO at the bottom of the list.
I already had a remainder of LEO on Arbitrum (I think it was 0.07), but otherwise my Arbitrum wallet on LeoDex reflects the 83 LEO transfer (minus a fee):
Add Liquidity
I already had CACAO in my account. If not you'll have to get some, for example by swapping half of LEO to CACAO.
To add LEO-CACAO liquidity from LeoDex, the theoretical process is simple:
- you select the Liquidity menu from the top
- you enter the desired amount of LEO and the other side will be automatically filled in with the appropriate amount
- you click Deposit Liquidity
and... it should work.
The problem is for me it worked once the first time I did it at the beginning of LeoDex, and then twice it didn't work, including today. The error received is UNPREDICTABLE_GAS_LIMIT. I already reported it last time.
But if it doesn't work, that's ok... We've got options. I have searched for them today.
Alternatives
My first alternative interface to check out to complete my process of adding liquidity to LEO-CACAO was ThorSwap because they recently added support for the Maya Protocol and I am familiar with it. But... unless I missed it, there is no way yet to add liquidity to Maya via Thorswap, only to swap tokens on Maya. Liquidity on Thorswap is still unilaterally linked to Thorchain and RUNE.
Ok... So what next? Well, I guess I'll take the Maya interfaces one by one and see where this works.
Where can you check top Maya interfaces? Well, there is a so-called "Interface Wars" on Maya, with various tops, and there you can check out other Maya interfaces.
This is the link to the Interface Wars on Maya.
So, I took them from top down. I didn't want to try Ascardex (3rd position), because that's a desktop wallet, and didn't want to download the appimage now (after I reinstalled my OS).
I started with ThorWallet, but at a first look, I didn't see how to add liquidity from it.
I then moved to El Dorado, the second in the list of swap fees. It is the oldest Maya interface if my speed reading didn't cause me to mix things up. And... it has support for adding liquidity. Which I did.
The result...
This interface doesn't show when a transaction is successful either (""success" instead of "pending"), but I confirmed that my liquidity was added from LeoDex, where I saw my LP increase broadcasting the transaction via El Dorado. LEO and the matching amount of CACAO for the LP was deducted from my wallet as well.
Conclusion
Using DEXes, even when things don't work, they work. Because you can find different alternatives to do the same thing. And at least one of the alternatives won't be a roadblock.
But with CEXes, things are different. If they hold your funds hostage, it's nothing you can do.
Want to check out my collection of posts?
It's a good way to pick what interests you.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha
Posted Using InLeo Alpha
You summarized it well. With Dexes you can find your way around. It's not perfect it's not as popular, but your funds are SAFU. Switching interfaces is one of those added advantages, for now, the smaller figures are working.
Yeah, for some reason people still trust CEXes more or they wouldn't still dominate in transaction volume. They also have a lot of pairs and coins listed. Maybe that matters too.
I think DEXEs will eventually grow, however I still fill cexes will bring more adoption as time goes on. It's like a necessity evil (cex) that still has its perks
View more
I would say all the marketing + affiliate programs of CEXs have a lot to do with this on top of the added "convenience" of not having to be your own bank. Cryptosphere has a marketing problem once you get out of the scam/meme territory. Some of the best technologies come with some of the worst marketing. We are already using one such project!
!PIZZA
View more
Wow good friend, I totally get the appeal of diversifying into different pools. It’s smart to keep exploring new opportunities. I'm curious, how do you see this affecting your overall strategy in the long run though?
It doesn't affect my strategy. I had already planned adding LEO to liquidity pools even before LEO existed on Arbitrum, the new LeoDex was launched or the LEO-CACAO was created. These decisions of mine are in alignment with my overall strategy.
You're a pro man, I've got so much to learn from you
There are so many pools. Do you think the Maya pool is the most profitable? THere are just so many out there with diesel and the others around. Are you going to be able to keep track of the profit?
I just found out. The APR is currently 1.72% for LEO-CACAO. It would be higher if there were higher fees (i.e. swaps via LeoDex). Khal mentioned he is thinking to move Geyser rewards from Ethereum to Maya, in which case this APR would increase even at low fees. The deeper the pool the less slippage on higher transactions. Higher transactions, higher fees. Higher fees, more LP attracted, deeper pool. It can be a circular thing, but somewhere it has to start.
I looked around, and yes, other pools have a little higher APR from fees. On diesel pools, yes, we can find higher rewards on many pools, but probably not on the LEO ones, which have no additional incentives other than fees.
In this way, all of us must do it, it supports the project and we also get some reward.
All of this is true. It also helps strengthen one of Hive's non-custodial routes to other ecosystems.
The sweetest thing is that there are so many alternatives which can be very cool
The more, the better. That is true. And funds are always under your control.
This is good info to know if I am going to use the service in the future. It is interesting that problems seem to occur regularly. I don't think I've had issues with CEX, but I do agree that their control over my funds doesn't make me feel secure.
Before they closed, Bittrex used to disable HIVE or HBD deposits and withdrawals for MONTHS without any explanation. If you had any of them there or wanted to move them in, you had to swap to a different coin and withdraw to another CEX that supported Hive pairs. That is if Hive transactions weren't disabled too, in which case, you couldn't do anything. I didn't have anything there, but I've heard stories and I had an account and checked those stories myself.
Oh wow, that was insane. I have some small funds currently stuck in Binance because the Philippines decided to ban access to them. CEXs can be scary.
Congratulations @gadrian! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP@tipu curate
Upvoted đŸ‘Œ (Mana: 33/53) Liquid rewards.
$PIZZA slices delivered:
@vimukthi(1/5) tipped @gadrian