RE: SHUT UP

The idea of using a system to tackle another system is relatable and achievable when no one can be pointed to be the pioneer of the revolution.

This is how terrorists groups strive, the book haram, the Islamic groups and all the others who have gone before them still strive to date because they have a system people believe in.

When they attack or carry out their plans you only see the results and not the main people involved. In war there will definitely be casualties, the thing is people are not afraid to die or fight, they are just afraid to die for nothing.

There's nothing as powerful as a believe system of change. If a system of good is created to fight the authorities in government, their first step will be to kill, but when the realize that the people are not afraid of dieing and the people show strength by being more clinical and tactical than they anticipated they would be forced to re strategize and start looking for whatever is fueling the people's belief. If they can't get that, they are very close to losing power.

I will always say, power is a myth, it's only where people decide it to be. The people can take power from the government, but taking power means controlling the narrative. To do that the people must first slowly take control of everything that can be used to hurt the masses. Shut out the re-enforcement power of the government and make them look like a joke with no one person coming out to say I am the one leading this revolution, no way to track what's financing the revolution, and at the end of the day no one to bring down for sponsoring such revolution.