will always say, power is a myth, it's only where people decide it to be.
I agree. However, once power is given to the hands of those who know well to use it, they utilize it to the extent where it becomes arduous to get that power back. A series of struggle is needed.
The idea of using a system to tackle another system is relatable and achievable when no one can be pointed to be the pioneer of the revolution.
Hmmmmmm. Those who stood against SARS had a pioneer?? I just heard of what happened to protestors but no idea about how the campaign was launched.
When they attack or carry out their plans you only see the results and not the main people involved
Does it mean that the people should plan out things hiding themselves? Even then, if the master minds making people collect on a system are hidden, is it possible to carry out plans without the upfront warriors?
I am just trying to understand how is it possible to implement a system against another strong system without coming to the front and facing the horrible consequences in the beginning of the struggle.
Thanks for taking your time to respond.
!LUV
@kilvnrex, @amberkashif(1/4) sent you LUV. | tools | discord | community | HiveWiki | <>< daily
Yes they had pioneers, celebrities who sponsored the campaign, falz for example who was one of those at the forefront.
What made the end SARS revolution end was when the government ordered that the accounts of those celebrities be froven making it hard for them to access their funds.
The government isn't the president. The president is the man the people knows to be in power. The real cabals are not known and the president carry out their bids. These are the people who influence power in government.
So to fight people you do not know, you must first be hidden else if they know you they can hurt you in ways you can't begin to imagine.
There must always be upfront warriors, these are the people the government will tackle first, the people who will carry out the will of the new system.
But then anyone can be an upfront warrior, even a mad man. In a game of strategy there are always those we see and those we don't. For example, if knowing that the government sends funds to certain accounts for protection, an upfront warrior might be the ICT personnel in the bank whose job is to divert those funds and turn the people the government pays for protection into an enemy making those people another upfront warrior who would fight the government based on a miscommunication that was created. Again it's a game of strategy.
View more