You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: What Would You Like To See On Hive More? .:. Hive Humpday Hangout Ep.38 (Wednesday, February 12th, 5 PM UTC)

There are alot to say, but first I want to say;

I think we first need a straight vote distribution on HIVE. A post contains about 50 words shouldn't reach $10 payout if we mention quality content every so often.

0.00005011 BEE
2 comments

Agree on quality, not per definition the amount of words though…
I’ve seen 💯 posts with 5 words and a great photo, and receiving 0.02 in payout, and posts with 2000words of pure rubbish, almost just random words repeated, and receiving +10€ or even a lot more as payout.
So totally agree on the quality thing!

0.00002603 BEE

I can't say that I disagree, but in that context, it's hard to find a way to "prevent" it. It's not the issue of people who are creating that content, but more about the people who are upvoting. As in most cases, those are automatic upvotes, preaching manual curation is the only way to do things more "fair." Not only that, manual curation is doing a lot more in decentralizing the reward pool distribution.

Supporting automatic upvotes, following big curation trails, or delegating all your HivePower to big accounts is shooting ourselves in the foot...

0.00002342 BEE

Can you elaborate more that idea? How do you mean "straight vote distribution on HIVE"? That everyone's upvote value is the same?

6.5E-7 BEE

No, I meant that votes should go to the quality posts.

0.00002439 BEE