You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Women and The "Grass is Greener in the Streets Syndrome"
Whoever resorted to jibes first clearly had no other good points. My reply clearly showed you the reasoning backing up the opinion you said was unfounded.
If you look at what I said about how women had to depend on men for provision throughout history until recently due to better civil liberties, and how that is one of the reasons why it is still common for women to think about choosing the option of only letting a man provide rather than stressing over provision themselves you'd agree that is a strong point, if you're capable of any honesty.
Your resorting to a jibe clearly shows you were silenced by my points and had no logical reply. But you can dispute this if you want, and say you had something to say but couldn't be arsed. But I'm sure we'll never hear that something you had to say because the truth is it just doesn't exist. You've clearly reached your intellectual limit and all that's left for you are random jibes that don't require intellectual bytes.
Nevies, you haven't silenced me đ You've simply repeated the same unsupported leap - which you seem to do over and over.
âWomen historically depended economically on menâ does not logically lead to âtherefore 50%+ of women today think about making money from men via their bodies.â
That's the leap, right?
But they are two completely different claims - evidence connecting them isn't your FEELING that it âmakes senseâ.
And yes, saying 80% of a group behaves a certain way is quite literally a sweeping generalisation. Leaving out 20% doesn't somehow stop it being one no matter what you say.
As for my "jibes': mocking a weak argument doesn't make the argument stronger or suggest 'winning' - bizarre you are seeing it as a competition and feel the need to 'win', saying quote a bit about your ego.
âYou made a joke, therefore I wonâ isn't the intellectual flex you seem to think it is.
Anyway, I can't be bothered talking in circles now. I was pointing out a few things you should think about - digging your heels in so inflexible on your generalisations and flawed understanding of feminism isn't a flex or a 'win' and it certainly wasn't mean to be a battle where one cries victory, it was meant to be a discussion.
I'm disengaging with your inanity now. I should have scrolled on by. My silence now is because I have other people to engage with. Ciao