the dhf the way it is, is a joke. the idea is not bad, but to simply give money just because or because you have a friend or even a partner in crime with a huge HP is nonsense. Instead as i have seen in the comments, in the post and i have said in the past as well, accountability and a clear plan should exist. Also, the goal should be to increase the value of Hive somehow and to make the project generate income after a certain period of time in order to be self-sustainable and give the spot to another project. None of these truly takes place :P
I agree, there should be some accountability. It's great to give people a chance to realise their ideas, but if they're not delivering, and they don't show any progress there should be a safeguard in place to potentially cut funding.
Also, each project giving back to help other projects get off the ground would be good. Kind of like Dragons Den, they front the cost, but in return expect a percentage. There's nothing wrong with that logic.
As someone working with mental health and completing 3-4 times the same info in 3-4 different forms, I do not like it, but I agree that proper recording is needed sometimes.
It's pretty rare you find a program like this where there isn't at least some kind of follow up required. Documentation is key and I too have seen funds pulled back due to lack of transparency. I don't think it's unreasonable to implement something like this here on Hive.
the dhf the way it is, is a joke. the idea is not bad, but to simply give money just because or because you have a friend or even a partner in crime with a huge HP is nonsense. Instead as i have seen in the comments, in the post and i have said in the past as well, accountability and a clear plan should exist. Also, the goal should be to increase the value of Hive somehow and to make the project generate income after a certain period of time in order to be self-sustainable and give the spot to another project. None of these truly takes place :P
.
Accountability. A very important word I believe. How is the Hive blockchain doing with ensuring its investors that is in place?
.
I agree, there should be some accountability. It's great to give people a chance to realise their ideas, but if they're not delivering, and they don't show any progress there should be a safeguard in place to potentially cut funding.
Also, each project giving back to help other projects get off the ground would be good. Kind of like Dragons Den, they front the cost, but in return expect a percentage. There's nothing wrong with that logic.
.
As someone working with mental health and completing 3-4 times the same info in 3-4 different forms, I do not like it, but I agree that proper recording is needed sometimes.
.
It's pretty rare you find a program like this where there isn't at least some kind of follow up required. Documentation is key and I too have seen funds pulled back due to lack of transparency. I don't think it's unreasonable to implement something like this here on Hive.
I agree with this too!