13. THE-PERFECT-CRIME
by @bardsilver on Justinian Deception
View my bio on Blurt.media: https://blurt.media/c/justianian.deception 
"...The crime that has been committed here is that the administrator is no longer an impartial third party observer to the transaction. The judiciary/judges/magistrates (which should act as the administrator) are actually employees of the corporation "Commonwealth of Australia" based in Washington DC, which is the same corporation which receives the funds from us when we are paying money such as taxes, fines, bank debts etc. The judiciary can therefore not act as an impartial third party observer when they are not separate from the creditor. It is not for us to reclaim our name or which name or decide whether we are the creditor or the debtor. Our role is to point out that the administrator (the judicial system, magistrates, judges) cannot act as a true impartial administrator whilst they themselves are paid by the same corporation that receives the funds and is the creditor..."
"...Yes, and its a quasi debased trust as well that never lets the administrator ever stand as administrator! .. that office can only be debtor or creditor if only two subject are standing in a three office trust... as I have tried to explain... Its a deception! ... Al I guess I am trying to say is that standing as the creditor will render the Administrator back as debtor! ... and this may be the remedy, its like the black card that never runs out... but it takes a lot of comprehension, but it can be done..."
///
"...yes, the 4th entity is probably the living man that remains living or saved if remaining as the creditor. The trust is dead and has the three dead political standings: "D" "C" "A" but the forth is the man that directs the trust.... The man owns nothing because the legal title is with the trust but the trust identifies the equitable title with the man... Equity is the power of direction!... so with the man being the director and also the forth entity, he is no real part of the dead world of the three way quasi triad trust... I assume when Christ said "in my name you will be saved", I assume that Christ became the debtor for man, (The STATE) he died in order to let man remain living and as the director! but I also assume that Christ didn't hand this amazing power over willy nilly! .. lol ... you had to understand the story, the dreamtime story, being the "code" to life, the code to remain the living director.... by the time you work the code out, you realize that there is no money, it is power that you gain, the total power of direction over the dominion. The Tree of Life is a political stand....I agree but not with being "Born again", I believe that it is a case of retracing the steeps that we have taken down the wrong road... Most of us go so far down the wrong road that retracing our steps is just too hard, easer to remain dead until the end.... To be born again is not finding your way back to your estate, it is simply forgetting about the past and carrying on in the fraud... The symbol Z is for Zion and Zenith, being words that deal with retracing our way back to heaven. It is strange but in the symbolism, the path from God into the debtor of the debtor being the VASSAL, is the shape of a "Z" and to retrace our steps back into the truth, the path is from the bottom right back to the top left of the "Z" ... so, "I assume" that being born again is just another illusion to keep us looking in the wrong direction.... You must find your way back home, not abandon our home and be born again into something else. Born again is abandoning the first trust and that first trust may hold the "SOLE", so by leaving the SOLE, you will remain separated and you may never find your way back to the original estate..."
///
"...Sweet, so how do I say that to the solicitor without being called disjointed? and how do I say it to the QC without him recommending psychiatric treatment? I'm personally involved."
"...
@JustinianDeception
8 years ago
if you have to see such people than you need to be salvaged ... If you knew the truth, you would not need to even speak to such dogs...."
///
...when you think about it, you don't have any debts, the problem is that because we don't know who we are, we assume the name that is attached to the house of the debtor is our name and when we assume such a name to be our name, the real us becomes the trustee for their name that belongs to the State. Let go the name and it returns to the state. The State is the first debtor and is obligated to settle all the debts. When you hold the name of the creditor, you have no debts. I can only speak about the principle of the system. but think about it and you will see that the real you has no debts and you never did have a debt. Banks know when you know and they won't push the issue. They are smarter than governments and know that dumb people left to guard the treasury will leave it venerable to the one who knows the principles of the system.. (Private foreign corporate bankers). The treasury is your share of the mineral and energy wealth of your country still in the ground. That is the gold of the system of debt today..."
"...What you say may help if you want to remain within the house of the debtors?. The all caps name is the fictitious "office" and the name as a proper noun is the holder of such an office. I think the state owned name holds the office of debtor and the Christian name holds the office of creditor. I see the "office" of creditor as: "JOHN HENRY" and the "office" of debtor as "DOE", I see the holder name of the office of creditor as: "John Henry" and the office holder name of the debtor as; "John Henry Doe" ... (The State may hold the copyright to the noun-name: "John Henry Doe") If you think about this, you may see what's happened and how they fooled you into "assuming" that "John Henry" was "John Henry Doe". When the court "calls" you into the court as "John henry Doe" than who's proper name is that really? ... Maybe you assumed "John Henry DOE" was "John Henry Doe" and through an ignorance of "grammar" relating to "SIGN-LANGUAGE" you assumed the state owned name: "John Henry Doe" was you? when in fact, you were always only "John Henry" as evidenced by your BIRTH certificate?. Maybe there is no missing link to this concept? the problem may just be the ignorance of the State at present but at some time in the future, the state will be held accountable for its ignorant "mistake" that in the end, can't save them, however, will the masses ever have the ability to ever comprehend the complexity of trust law??? ... ha ha , probably not... so the bankers will probably stay safe for another 800 years... (Surnames came into being just after the Magna Carter, around 1230AD in order to deal with the Magna Carter, rendering the choice of remaining within the jurisdiction of common law or giving the individual the ability to choose the surname and enter into the maritime military jurisdiction of commercial paper. "Water Law", hence the State BIRTH Certificate that renders you as the debtor of the state) Not saying I am right or wrong, its just a concept to consider..."
"...?? ... the ALL-CAPS-NAME is not a name, its an "office", (Office of fiction) that is what a "birth" relates to, the birth of the office (Office of creditor, debtor and Administrator) and the name is what is housed in such an office. The all caps name you see on your birth certificate is not the name, its the two offices being the Creditor and Debtor office. The JOHN HENRY and the DOE have different dates of birth. If you create another office and "register" it as you claim, than you are not dealing with what has already been done by the state and the date of birth of your new office has nothing to do with their office. The date of birth of your JOHN HENRY DOE will be a different date and entity of their JOHN HENRY and their DOE, rendering your newly registered name as: "JOHN HENRY DOE" to be totally different to their JOHN HENRY DOE and you will be salvaged again as you walk into their court trying to deal with some JOHN HENRY DOE other than their JOHN HENRY DOE. You may have missed the whole point of the videos I have put up here, the deception is in the splitting of the name! JOHN HENRY and DOE are not a part of one name and the all upper case text used in the description of the OFFICE is a text that needs to be "hyphenated" in order that three words or SIGNS can become as one word. The John Henry Doe would have to appear as: "JOHN-HENRY-DOE in order to constitute one sign rendering of a name, that's just the facts about grammar..."
///
"...its the name! the SURNAME is not yours and the Christian name is the only evidence of what your real name is, the Christian name is the only proper name you have and when you incorporate the family name with your christian name, that is a corruption of your true name ... The remedy is in the name and the date of birth of that true Christian name, being birthed on the Registration date, not the born date..."
"...Yes, the trust exists in office form as 3 parties but only two officers are manned, that is what I am saying, a form of a fraud trust. Office of creditor, office of debtor and office of administrator but only one of the offices of debtor or creditor are manned. The trust is operating as a fiction but can only be consented too I assume..."
///
"@1darryloflife
8 years ago
Wrong."
"@JustinianDeception
All of this research is based on a key point being the identification of the "JOKER" in the document. Once the JOKER has been identified, the game or deception or the trick or the illusion that deceives the people, has been identified and the fact then overrides to fiction, rendering the illusion as exposed for what it originally was, being nothing.
People that serve and depend on such a fraud never wants the JOKER exposed, so the ones that call this research "wrong" may be benefiting from such a fraud..."