ahhhh.... this makes your post make more sense- I really thought by 'transaction fees' you meant adding liquidity.
What you really meant was every swap would generate additional income for the LP not that adding or removing liquidity would be penalized.
liquidity providers each have a specific % of the pool, based on their shares, based on how much they've added to that pool... I don't understand where this question comes from because it seems obvious? well, I guess that's only if you're active there, maybe from outside perspective it seems more complicated than it actually is.
Basically if you have 100% of the pool liquidity and people are adding value to it from the fee, then you still have 100% of the pool afterwards, it's just larger now, does that make sense?
ahhhh.... this makes your post make more sense- I really thought by 'transaction fees' you meant adding liquidity.
What you really meant was every swap would generate additional income for the LP not that adding or removing liquidity would be penalized.
If they gather in a pool with no distribution contract or rewards contract how will the distribution be determined?
liquidity providers each have a specific % of the pool, based on their shares, based on how much they've added to that pool... I don't understand where this question comes from because it seems obvious? well, I guess that's only if you're active there, maybe from outside perspective it seems more complicated than it actually is.
Basically if you have 100% of the pool liquidity and people are adding value to it from the fee, then you still have 100% of the pool afterwards, it's just larger now, does that make sense?
View more