Honestly, I didn't know there was a word for the many situations I've seen online where someone makes a serious mistake, and before anything official is done, the internet already reacts. People calling them out, dragging their name, and even try to remove them from their job or space. This is what many people call cancel culture.
So from what I understand personally, cancel culture is when a group of people online decides to reject or boycott someone because of something wrong they did even if the person may have faced legal punishments already. I do not know how exactly to feel about it, I just think it renders the laws or rules useless if it's allowed.
But to a good extent, it feels justified because if someone truly does something terrible, especially when it hurts others, it's expected that people feel the need to speak up as siilence can look like support, and no one wants to be seen as supporting wrong actions. So cancel culture is more like a quick form of justice sending a message that certain actions are not accepted.
The problem I have with this is how it is done.

Most of the time, it is driven by emotions, not full understanding as people react quickly without knowing the full story sometimes. I've seen a situation where even though the person was clearly guilty, the online reaction went too far with their reaction, insults, threats, and a complete attempt to destroy the person’s life. It is scary!
I believe that serious offenses, especially those that break the law, should always be handled by the right authorities. These systems in place for a reason so when the internet tries to replace that, things can get messy. Innocent people can be wrongly accused, and even guilty people can be punished in ways that goes beyond what is fair.
As justice can be slow or incomplete sometimes, it's understandable when online voices tries to bring attention and pressure but then, it is done in the wrong or excessive ways. The authorities do need the push to act as the public are watching but it should be done having humanity at heart and not in the harsh ways they do it now.
The best approach is balance and responsibility.
People should stay informed and speak up when something is wrong, but they should also be careful. Not every issue needs a harsh reaction. Asking questions, waiting for facts, and avoiding quick judgment can make a big difference. Instead of rushing to cancel, people can focus on encouraging justice through the right channels.
Well, in the end, cancel culture actually shows that people care about right and wrong which is kinda a good thing. But caring is not enough, the way to act on it matters too. Speaking up is good, but it should not replace fairness, truth, and the chance for people to do better. Even criminals or don't deserve punishment beyond their crime.
Image used is AI generated.