Nuclear Weapons Should Be Removed From Science
Casting my mind back to the days when I was much younger and the facilities available for us now and then, I get to understand that we have come a long way from the primitive era to this modernization. Growing up, I had little or no access to television, so when it finally came to our house, I was just interested in outdoor activities.
Now that I have my kids, all these gadgets are readily available for them, as they even get to clash on which one to go for at first. For moderation's sake, I have to talk them into using one gadget at a time to help them also build focus on a thing against their wish of just leaving all on and wanting to watch all at the same time, and the backlash at me is such that I will be so tense that my head will be dancing as a result of a headache because of the loud noise that comes from their gadgets.
Daily Science wants to meet height because humans have never been recorded to be satisfied with what they have. The achievement of one thing is the beginning of daring to achieve another. This has given us diverse advancements in various aspects ranging from human sciences to artificial intelligence down to nuclear weapons.One part of science that I don't agree totally with is in the place of developing nuclear weapons.
The present fight between Iran and Israel is a result of disagreements, so they resorted to using weapons developed as a result of the knowledge acquired from science. Imagine having a weapon that can wipe off the whole state at a blow and insisting on it to us. America, as the world power, insists that Iran will not own a nuclear weapon, but Iran is relating otherwise.The whole day has been thrown into serious confusion as a result of a nation's selfish desires.
This level of development in science does not mean good to humans in any way because, as we speak now, many innocent people are affected, and much property has been lost too. Businesses have been set back, of which many won't return to normal forever. There is always a better way to resolve issues, which is dialogue. Many people refuse to tread the route to dialogue because of ego.
That feeling of proving that I am more than the other is what always lands us into trouble. What that ego is rising, the people at that table forget to take into consideration those that their selfish decision will impact negatively.
There are sicknesses that have dealt terribly with hunan race talk of taminal illnesses and more, to me science should focus attention on how to bring an end to these diverse illness and i believe strongly it will be achieved in the place of unity. Having a world tht is sickness free in it totality is nearly impossible but if energy is put into science and just the way we have access to different gadgets we have that broad knowledge of how to take care of different sicknesses from home we willbhave a healthier State ehich wipl directly impact on other aspects positively because it is a healthy people tht makes the society healthy.
My enty to the last edition of this week's contest. Thank you for reading
Hmmm! I totally agree with you because it has cost so much harm to the society than any good that it has. I believe that when it is removed we will have a little peace because is making those countries feel that they have something they can use to destroy other countries.
Thanks for sharing
I agree with you on this one, why are we creating what can destroy us in less than a minute, I believe science has gone too far about this destructive weapon
We should ban all types of weapons and redirect investment to end world hunger and adapt to climate change.
See some data about it at my HL post:
https://ecency.com/hive-153850/@pablito.saldo/weapons-for-what-armas-para
!HUG
!HOPE
!UNICOIN 🦄
Nuclear weapons should be removed from science because it causes more harm than good. Thanks for sharing
Actually I see the problem of humans in another way: and that our brain needs challenges and new time to learn, because new connections are created and activated in the face of new challenges. In this sense, our own nature forces us to create new things when we are already boring to always be in the same thing, that is why science has led us to where we are today, the problem with this is that we will naturally end up exterminating ours Survival instinct leads us to think naturally that we must do things differently, and not fight to destroy ourselves. But this is an evolutionary process that will take billions of years, and in my opinion, we are barely in very early stages for this to happen.
I am sure that within billions of years, there will be another race from which we will be its extremely primitive ancestors, which will be ashamed of how clumsy and basic we are, creation science to destroy ourselves