You are viewing a single comment's thread:
agreed but not agree to the implementation. It is common that if an employee marries a coworker, one of them must exit the company. The rule and the law state only for the marriage, not the relationship and it is solely to avoid conflict of interest in the organization.
If I am the boss there, I will fire both out lol.
The girl gave up so the guy can still continue to work in the company.
the guy supposed to be a mentor or a superior to pass down the experience to her.
if you put your point of view from the organization, the guy has done a major fault. new recruit is like a gamble that company takes, some say it is an investment in human resource, but it could end as zero which that's what happened there. Either Organization needed someone cheap so they took the cheapest, or they wanted to plan something long on her as someone organic in organization. The fact that they assigned someone else to guide, it meant the organization lean to the second one, they wanted to nurture that girl into a well established personal at whatever position she was at or would get later.
if the HR put two fresh graduates or non experience staffs together and they got into a relationship... that what we called a RISK in HR decision. If two people in different division or function, somehow grow a fond towards each other, that's what we call human interaction, none knows where it would go
But if you put an experience one to guide his juniors, and that one knew the rule and policy, and still he got into relationship with the junior in a short timeline. He forgot his priority there, He failed to draw a line between himself to her.
and there is a say, which exist everywhere... Do not Shit where you eat.
It is the same as you send your kids to school then they get in relationship with the teacher because the teacher is too young...
View more