You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Opinion Series Part 5: Which Would You Choose: Your Career or the One You Love?

the guy supposed to be a mentor or a superior to pass down the experience to her.

if you put your point of view from the organization, the guy has done a major fault. new recruit is like a gamble that company takes, some say it is an investment in human resource, but it could end as zero which that's what happened there. Either Organization needed someone cheap so they took the cheapest, or they wanted to plan something long on her as someone organic in organization. The fact that they assigned someone else to guide, it meant the organization lean to the second one, they wanted to nurture that girl into a well established personal at whatever position she was at or would get later.

if the HR put two fresh graduates or non experience staffs together and they got into a relationship... that what we called a RISK in HR decision. If two people in different division or function, somehow grow a fond towards each other, that's what we call human interaction, none knows where it would go

But if you put an experience one to guide his juniors, and that one knew the rule and policy, and still he got into relationship with the junior in a short timeline. He forgot his priority there, He failed to draw a line between himself to her.

and there is a say, which exist everywhere... Do not Shit where you eat.

It is the same as you send your kids to school then they get in relationship with the teacher because the teacher is too young...

0.00000000 BEE
1 comments

If we strictly refer to the company handbook, which is what HR is supposed to follow, both of them should have been terminated because the violation is clearly stipulated in the handbook as grounds for termination.

However, in the Philippines, not everything written in a handbook is applied strictly in all situations. Decisions are still handled on a case-to-case basis.

There are business owners or CEOs who, even if they know that an employee’s action is a ground for termination, still choose to be lenient because that employee is considered one of the company’s valuable assets.

In their situation, what happened was that the guy was only suspended for a few days because the CEO considered him an asset to the company. Meanwhile, the woman voluntered to exit, just so the guy would not be terminated.

Maybe she was really inlove with that guy.

0.00000000 BEE