You are viewing a single comment's thread:
People who make the argument that AI users contributed minimally to the output have never tried to create content using AI that is anywhere near publication ready.
Two scenarios:
Anybody that is able to pass content as their own without it being obvious that it was AI-generated put a lot more work into it than most of the human-created content on Hive receives.
I've tried to use AI to create content because I don't actually enjoy writing that much. But I have standards, and creating content I would sign my name to is harder with AI than it is to just write it myself.
Very interesting! I've never tried it myself, so this was quite revelatory to read. Thanks for the insight.
I'm going to put this up for a community vote this month.
@jfuji you may find this interesting.
@leana-ramen possibly the best approach would be for you to include a higher proportion of your original writing, similar to the 2nd scenario that Joseph presented here, and just include the disclaimer that you used AI to enhance your grammar, spelling, word choice, etc. I don't think anybody but the most stringent critics would hold this against you.
View more