You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: The Desolation of Duskwood, chapter 1, Arrival at Duskwood Manor - part 8

last year

Greatly appreciate your input, Joseph! Now I'm wondering about another scenario: what if a written article is completely AI-generated, as per admission of the author?

I've seen arguments that because the topic or idea is still thought of by the author, the resultant content is still technically original and theirs to claim ownership. The counterargument would be that they contributed very minimally to the output - and in academic settings, this is not considered valid original work.

0.00000142 BEE

1 comments

@josephsavage66

last year(edited)

People who make the argument that AI users contributed minimally to the output have never tried to create content using AI that is anywhere near publication ready.

Two scenarios:

minimal input and it's pretty obvious that it's AI generated, and really not that good either.
keep working with it, adjusting prompts, stitching pieces together for flow and maybe having AI redo sections that need more work to be decent quality.

Anybody that is able to pass content as their own without it being obvious that it was AI-generated put a lot more work into it than most of the human-created content on Hive receives.

I've tried to use AI to create content because I don't actually enjoy writing that much. But I have standards, and creating content I would sign my name to is harder with AI than it is to just write it myself.

0E-8 BEE