You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Are We Cheating?
People still need to think critically and interact with the "output" of the LLM / AI and have some knowledge of the subject matter.
The other thing to take into account. We went from not being able to fly to men on the moon in a very short period of time. What's the next "leap" that can happen from now to then?
I think the bottleneck will be the engineering to make the science work.
0.00090639 BEE
That's kind of where I was going with this. This isn't the first time we have made strides in science and technology, but it feels a bit more hands off this time. Like I said, is the AI doing all the work or is it just a tool? I'm not sure I know the answer and it probably varies depending on who you talk to.
I know a lot less than what I know.
I feel like it depends on who is using it. A hammer is a tool in the hands of a skilled wood worker. In the hands of a crazed lunatic, its a weapon.
In my hands? its something I drop on my toes, probably hurting only myself.
I think people that treat "AI" as a "human", or a "partner" (or co-pilot, if you will) have probably failed the Turing test by some measure, but they're ... aware they're interacting with the machine.
But yet, they see the output as some sort of collaboration between them and the machine, and tend to feel a sense of ownership of that output. That feels strange, because I can't be seen (or would feel like I should) own the "output" of a conversation between you and I.
(Unless we were academics at a conference or something, or publishing a co-written paper)
View more