You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Is This Hive's Verified Check Mark?
(edited)
Absolutely not. Hard Disagree.
The Rep system is a whale game, if you decide to dislike me today and just put me into auto downvote - you alone can 0 me. That is not how reputation works.
Haejinis literally the best example, you have the Hive fund and the most rejected person of the Chain on Spot 1 and 2.
No, that stuff needs an overhaul and Twitter is way smarter with their Rep System, they just don't show you the public score yet, but Musk committed to doing that somewhere down the year.
edit:
There you go, I dug it up
0.00080642 BEE
That’s a point. I like the reputation idea here on Hive but I see the issue it has. Where did you find the info about Twitter reputation and Musk?
wow,... I'll have to search a bit.
This was one of the confirmations about the Twitter "Status" of an Account, the best I could find right now. You'd have to listen to the dedicated Twitter Spaces on Musks Timeline to dig deeper.
https://twitter.com/BillyM2k/status/1642008773891092480?s=20
He replied confirming this. There are a bunch more, but hell Twitter is a big black hole sometimes and time is finite.
View more
This is the Open Source part of the Algo,
https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm
Here is one of the Tweets by NFT God about the Account Reputation,
https://twitter.com/NFT_GOD/status/1641931727928016898?s=20
You can grind yourself up and down his explanations, he's pretty detailed and the rest can be found in responses or comments.
View more
Like I mentioned, it's not perfect. But the DNA of what 'could be' is there. I'm no whale, I'm number 45 on there. Task isn't a whale either, he's number 3.
I really hate to see this failed system in place for a multitude of reasons. It does not protect to platform from bad actors, it does not protect anyone from spam and it's easy to game.
If we would just not show and use it anymore, all Apps would be better because this wrongfully called "Reputation" can't damage anyone anymore. Ask @jelly13 for example how he got to a great score.
The Blue check is very effective at creating a minimum permanent buy-in for accounts to leave value back independent of what the account is used for. It would be very smart to have a system like that on this Blockchain. The endless witchhunt led by those crazy Discord Cave Trolls who police the chain day and night could be dramatically contained. Hive could do it in a very elegant fashion, with permanent Hive Power lock-up - a true timeless commitment to permanent Hive Power. Any account that does that, could be left alone for a long time. You could bring people to the chain, teach them nothing, let them get verified, and learn from their own mistakes without getting trashed by the Hive Police over less than a buck rewards. I call that a great solution to a lot of headaches.
View more
Maybe my point of view is a bit distorted, I don't see any priority higher than bringing and keeping new stakeholders around. Anything that has a negative effect on this target has to be questioned for an update or by default abolished. If every new user is seen as untrustworthy due to "Reputation" and low "Reputation" is offboarding users, what it does, then it's most sensible to outright delete it and work on a different solution asap, in that order.