You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Wow, this is wonderful. WOTW spirit back online.. I can see that the grave has well been plotted, and the new team are up to the task.. WOTW is in safe hands again.
The only thing is how possible it will be for readers to vote appropriately, as some contestants really do not get much engagements under their contests as others. I understand that come contents might not be relatable of attention seeking enough to readers, and that should be a reason enough not to be considered for voting, but what about those contestants that has made good connects over the time and will always have more readers engaging under their contestants, and more votes, donโt you think past influence would favor those once most ?, but since there is going to be another grading system after the public votes, I am more than open to see how well it will work.
Thanks, my friend. the beauty of Dreemport is that the posts are curated by the public (anyone registered with Dreemport) and they get assigned 5 random posts by the system so they don't get to choose whose posts they curate officially for Dreemport rankings. This way you have different people reading your posts each day you submit posts to Dreemport and therefore for each contest ...and there will be people curating the following day who didn't even take part in the contest. Of course anyone who wants to have their say in the curation of the contest posts, simply needs to log in to dreemport the day after Submissions day and curate hehe. We have people coming to Dreemport brand new...from other platforms like read.cash who know nobody... and have been ranked first on debut... so I think in general any potential bias is well filtered by the system. Nothing is perfect but your article will be curated by 5 random people people each time and once we have our top 5, then thosewill be graded against the Merit grading model developed by Cal and Felix... if we are able to extend the grading down the line to cover more entries, we will...but for now...we have to feel the waters and work out what is most sustainable as we know from Cal, Felix and Nonso's experience that grading every submission takes an inordinate amount of time and is not realistically sustainable if we want the contest to be scalable. Great question though! Thank you for raising it here !PIZZA !ALIVE
View more