RE: SportsTalkSocial: Proposal to implement deep changes

I was able to get the 2 options for my proposal, but the system has yet to notify that the proposal has failed to pass.

The whole thing was, and is highly experimental, and temperamental. But I don't think I marketed it as a DAO, as it's a little too centralized at 2 points to call it that. The account owner has ultimate control, and this code was designed to allow a community owner to yield that control over to a community. The account owner can at any point decide to no longer yield control, and remove authorization. (the 1st point of centralization)

This hasn't happened yet...

What has happened is that the code hosted on my server (the other centralized point) is dated, and in need of an update. But as I've stated before, getting 51% of stake to vote on it is going to be very difficult, so for now fixing this is lower on my priority list.