RE: Play the game together.
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
You spelt my name wrong as most people tend to do :p
Anyways.. My understanding is you want to make a DHF proposal and/or witnesses to provide some level of financial buy support for tokens for games?
Problem with that is WHY? Honestly the game should have build into it's tokinomics some way to provide buy support to support their tokens. They should have taken into account inflation speed of their tokens and many other factors when creating it and already have in place mechanisms to support the token be it external revenue or w/e.
Many have in fact done just that, even still they struggle, not enough revenue not enough players. Most games don't have much presense on twitter/X or other social media, they make no effort or just don't dedicate a little bit of time each day to maintaining socialmedia presense.
Honestly... it's not a completely mad idea. but I'd like requirements on games to actually TRY exist for real and actually have a presense outside of hive so they actually get new users. If you don't shill and build a presense they will never come.
But the chance of a DHF proposal like this getting funded is basically 0. DHF is hardly functioning properly as it is with serious lack of engagement.
Have a go either way, Personally it's not something I'd support.
Shmoogleosukami
Apologies about the misspelling
NO. Nothing to do with games.
Games are an example of support not bring there for the development, by financial means.
I think that in working for the chain like some do in various ways. coding witnessing or other. even those that use the chain just for blogging. should get a better deal.
I have already tested the theory online by use of token creation and use of multi account along with other members of my immediate community. During the test over a 6 month period, I gave all a 5% gain on anything given to support, and still grew the account. I gave additional bonus at the end.
And the account values over all grew. With no power down or use of older funding.
Now I have moved to the physical world and have ownership of a coffee machine in a local shop. The sales for the coffee create the demand for the COLT token.
Now I would like to expand this and offer to the same shop energy. A verbal agreement has been made to discuss this by the building owner if I raise the funding.
Huckleberrie account is building the funding to use for the purchase of a solar system. payments to the huckleberrie account will be made regular for the purchase of COLT token. some will be held back and powered up to grow a continuing support for projects. The ideology is to lock that accounts HP. A minimum amount held by Hucklenerrie should also be established. This minimum should increase as the account grows.
At a certain point. what the accounts do on the chain becomes minimal compared to the purchase power coming back in. Make this happen and Hive can be everywhere. Using the FIAT returns for creation of education water facilities energy the resources needed to where they are needed.
You can remove the control over finance that still exists today.
Cards were an example of. Reversing the trend is what is needed. We need to put HIVE HBD to projects outside of the chain not on it. and let that revenue build the chain. People keep saying industry needs to use blockchain. WTF does blockchain ignore industry?
I can only do this on a small scale alone, and doing it big I do not want control over that kind of money.
I believe Hive can do what they said BTC would do. I can explain how mortgage can work with ease.
I can envision without pause the ability for Hive to support research in various fields and reach a time where 2nd layer tokens are used as an investment technique from speculators to individual projects undertaken on the chain.
Me I want to play a part in making it happen, I think I made a start at it.
OOOHH, I get ya, I've always found people using revenue sources from the physical world to generate growth for tokens/blockchains a fascinating thing and quite frankly a nobrainer.
It's such a good idea, Like you say with the solar example. Generate electricity, supply the shop with free energy and then any surplus goes to buying in this case COLT.
Sounds like a sound idea and something that'll be perpetual for many years so long as the hardware holds up.
I'd be all for DHF funds going to fund such projects so long as those in control are reputable, multi-sig accounts help too.
But like you say most either don't want that level of responsibility or are not know/trusted enough for such proposals to pass.
But overall, This is absolutely something more people should try do if they are able to.
Multi sign I think is a must. For me now with the coffee Well most of it should be going to huckleberrie account the delegation account. and a slice to tommys.shop. but I think right now all should just go to small for delegation to get it started and bulk to hucklenerrie to get those funds up.
I can see this working within all levels of society. but should work as a non profit too. Benefits or profits should be directed toward consolidating what we have or things like human resources a better water system education research independent housing Each generation can build on it.
I might beover reaching in thinking it can develop to a decentralised finance monitored and controlled by polls that determine where the funding goes. This also has some levels to it.
For bigger amounts of funding development of a multi layer multi sign might be needed.
It's like BTC can DWTF it wants. But when it drops. Hive should be the ship people jump to.