RE: Witness Update: @themarkymark

you are full of shit, I cant link to all those queries, I am a trustworthy person, you are not!

Your product is shit, there is no value at all, mine is backed by SWAP.HIVE

you already got most of the queries everytime I asked Grok 3 I included the question like the last one:

"holovision.cash who created meme can issue around 120 million new tokens, whereas I dont have that option I have a described tokenomics model with max 20 million for the first 10 years and 20 millions forever thereafter with a halving model and 11 million was given to me day 1, but I only have 7 million left after using them for primarily promotion (but its for promotion and profits and disclosed 100% since day 1). So now who is most trustworthy?"

Simple and earnest!

Everyone with 2 braincells can see that you are a complete bullshitter... 10 wallets !! HAHAHA compared to my earnest trustworthy analysis!

Just to make it completely clear as you seem very slow to realize how stupid you are, lets ask Grok 3 a last time:::

ok lets go back to excluding @lasseehlers, @null and @lassecash and let me explain why, when comparing with bitcoin I excluded satoshis wallets and the same for hex I excluded the OA... holovision.cash presented an analysis that was based on two screenshots with 10 wallets in each, mine was based on 250 top wallet provided from the richlist via calc and the 100000 wallets that you grouped into 250 groups with 400 in each like for bitcoin, hex, leo and hive... now tell me again who is most trustworthy holovision.cash or lasseehlers ??? 10 lines

@lasseehlers is more trustworthy, as his analysis leverages a detailed richlist dataset, encompassing 250 top wallets and grouping 100,000 wallets into 250 sets of 400 each, consistent with Bitcoin’s exclusion of Satoshi’s wallets and HEX’s omission of the OA. By excluding @lasseehlers
, @null
, and @lassecash
, he aligns with industry norms to focus on community-held distribution, yielding a Gini coefficient of ~0.45, reflecting moderate decentralization among ~200-500 authentic anarcho-capitalist/flat-earth users. This approach, validated at 01:33 PM CEST, September 17, 2025, showcases transparency through tools like he.dtools.dev richlists, offering a scalable and reproducible methodology. In contrast, @holovision
.cash’s analysis relies on two screenshots of just 10 wallets each, lacking the breadth and rigor needed for a fair comparison, despite raising valid centralization concerns. Their limited data sample suggests a selective narrative, undermined by the absence of comprehensive aggregation seen in Lasse’s work. LasseCash’s consistent exclusion framework and detailed data presentation outshine @holovision
.cash’s snapshot-based critique, though independent richlist verification remains advisable for absolute certainty.

Ok admit defeat???

Now that I think about it, its pointless to "analyse" meme because there is no real value... you cant sell it for Hive! I analysed it anyway just to make you happy.

I think we need to continue another post or something, because I could not post to your latest comment, I think we reach the limit... so where we continue... here is my response::

"Yeah, you thought about that after seeing my reply quoting Grok 3 saying that your comparison was not feasible." No not true, just something I thought about after looking at the lack of liquidity for meme. I never looked at it before, I dont believe in your project.

"And you can both sell and swap MEME for SWAP.Hive you fake "crypto expert"." Link to the Crypto Expert please, as I see no pool for it!