Conclusion: LasseCash very decentralized in ownership.
ok thanks finally... now lets take a look at the DISTRIBUTION on LasseCash, I exclude @lassecash as its only for inflation for the first 10 years and I exclude @lasseehlers as its the leaders account that always should have a lot to be able to resolve disputes amoung other stuff:
So here I am doing all the hard work for you again:
Take a look at top 250 which is a lot of users on such a small crypto product:
Now compare that with Hive: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now compare that with Bitcoin: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded Satoshi's wallets).
Now compare to HEX: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded OA's wallets).
Now compare to LEO: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now this is a very fast analysis and there is many ways to do this, but I think this is very earnest. LasseCash is VERY decentralized in ownership compared to Hive, HEX, Bitcoin and LEO. Now I know you dont like HEX, but many people do and it will do a 10000X.
So yes LasseCash looks very decentralized in ownership!
Searched for "token distribution concentration top holders Bitcoin Ethereum HEX PulseChain"
10 results
Show All (2)
Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (top 100 holders control ~15-20% of supply), Ethereum (staking contracts and exchanges hold ~80%, with Beacon Deposit at 50%), and HEX on PulseChain (top 10% holders control ~65%, with founder-linked addresses at ~90%) exhibit high concentration, while LEO and Hive show moderate decentralization (top 100k ~85-95%). In contrast, LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership, with its top 250 wallets (excluding founder and inflation accounts) holding a far smaller share than comparable groups in Hive, Bitcoin, HEX, and LEO, promoting broader distribution among holders.
LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership
Conclusion: LasseCash very decentralized in ownership.
ok thanks finally... now lets take a look at the DISTRIBUTION on LasseCash, I exclude @lassecash as its only for inflation for the first 10 years and I exclude @lasseehlers as its the leaders account that always should have a lot to be able to resolve disputes amoung other stuff:
So here I am doing all the hard work for you again:
Take a look at top 250 which is a lot of users on such a small crypto product:
Now compare that with Hive: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now compare that with Bitcoin: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded Satoshi's wallets).
Now compare to HEX: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets (Excluded OA's wallets).
Now compare to LEO: Took top 100000 wallets and grouped them in 400s to mimic 250 top wallets.
Now this is a very fast analysis and there is many ways to do this, but I think this is very earnest. LasseCash is VERY decentralized in ownership compared to Hive, HEX, Bitcoin and LEO. Now I know you dont like HEX, but many people do and it will do a 10000X.
So yes LasseCash looks very decentralized in ownership!
Lets ask Grok 3 for a fast analysis:
summarize the distribution of tokens in the biggest cryptos compared to LasseCash, 2 lines https://www.lassecash.com/@lasseehlers/conclusion-lassecash-very-decentralized-in-ownership
Searched for "token distribution concentration top holders Bitcoin Ethereum HEX PulseChain"
10 results
Show All (2)
Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (top 100 holders control ~15-20% of supply), Ethereum (staking contracts and exchanges hold ~80%, with Beacon Deposit at 50%), and HEX on PulseChain (top 10% holders control ~65%, with founder-linked addresses at ~90%) exhibit high concentration, while LEO and Hive show moderate decentralization (top 100k ~85-95%). In contrast, LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership, with its top 250 wallets (excluding founder and inflation accounts) holding a far smaller share than comparable groups in Hive, Bitcoin, HEX, and LEO, promoting broader distribution among holders.
LasseCash demonstrates superior decentralization in ownership
Checkmate crypto noob!
View more