RE: The Leo finance proposal: to vote or not to vote?

We have two marketing proposals for the DHF. One is funded almost immediately every quarter for a long time, and allow me to doubt the efficiency of that funding (plus, in a popularity contest, it is probably among the last ones, despite some of the good things it funds, due to the bad ones).

The other one is Inleo. It is my impression it already delivered more with less. But it is only my impression, and facts are thrown from both sides to be checked, analyzed and decided upon. Something else to consider: when someone talks about connections to other ecosystems, especially in marketing endeavors, it's better to have connections in those ecosystems. And by all I have seen so far looks like the Inleo team has them. Let me be clear: they are not angels, they have faults, they also screwed up in the past (and some people will never forget that), but they also deliver, in my opinion.

Give me an alternative marketing proposal that can get the support it needs and is trustworthy to deliver on what they say they would do. I would vote on that too. Or even instead, if it's a much better proposal.