You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: I invested $500 in a beta NFT game: the results will surprise you.
Thank you very much @libertycrypto27 for your comments and before doing this simulation the first thing I wrote was this
serve as an approximate guide for those who are thinking of entering this ecosystem and want to understand how their investment could behave over time, but as the name says it is a simulation and I am human and I can also be wrong in some value or number.
And I'm checking that because you tell me I was wrong in my numbers, but I also said that there are many variants in this; if something changes, the simulation changes too. I took all the information from the page, but you tell me I'm unfounded, and I respect and appreciate that. When I make a post, I always say that if I'm wrong, they should leave it in a comment. But I'm seeing that people, or very few people, don't bother to read it, which you did, and I'm happy about it. So, to conclude, what you tell me is another variant of a result, that's what I think.
Hi @wizloge
I initially interacted with you in good faith because no one is perfect and everyone can make mistakes but I would have expected another response instead of:
I asked you two specific questions about your simulation calculations.
You did not answer me because I think there are no calculations behind your simulation.
Your simulation does not have a correct or real calculation and I explained why.
1 ladyluck packs costs 4 SCRIPT = 6.12 HIVE = $1.47
The reward token is COLONY, not COL (which doesn't exist).
No rewards have ever been distributed yet! Calculating a "31-year ROI" makes no sense in this context = is an imaginary calculation.
There's no direct correlation between number of packs and Hot Sauce production: it depends on card rarity, merge count, and staking slots.
To stake NFTs and produce Hot Sauce, it's mandatory to stake 2 SCRIPT per NFT, something completely ignored in your post.
Your estimated daily Hot Sauce (14.7/day for 147 packs) is absurdly low because I produce almost 10 times that with only 25 packs and 35 staked cards.
The title says “I invested $500”, but the entire analysis is a simulation based on incorrect or invented data.
Hive is a great place to share opinions and ideas, but also a place where accurate information matters
But above all, the reader deserves respect, and you have not respected him.
You could have written for example “I made a mistake and made imaginary calculations without data or without delving into the dynamics of the game” I would have appreciated your sincerity.
Nothing personal but this post is worth 0 because it does not respect the reader. For this reason I downvoted this imaginary simulation.
In the next ones try to do correct analysis with correct data and show how you arrived at your results otherwise on Hive anyone can throw random data passing it off as true.
Hive rewards should go to content that adds value, not confusion.
Please take more care with data and facts in your future posts
@hivewatchers I am not an AI expert but this post with so much invented data looks like (I have no certainty) a post generated by a wrong prompt with little and incorrect data provided
View more