RE: Witness Update: @themarkymark

word salat, again you are full of shit. This is how its done, just like I said in the first analysis there are many ways to do it but its an earnest way to do it faster then some deeper analysis, here is the right way to ask Grok 3:

Can you accurately compare the distribution of a Hive-Engine token with a market cap of less than $15,000 to Bitcoin or Ethereum's distribution? Why or why not?No, it is not possible to accurately compare the distribution of a Hive-Engine token with a market cap under $15,000 to that of Bitcoin or Ethereum in a reliable, standardized way. 3 lines

No, it is not possible to accurately compare the distribution of a Hive-Engine token with a market cap under $15,000 to Bitcoin or Ethereum’s (market caps $1.2T and ~$300B, respectively, as of 01:58 PM CEST, September 17, 2025) in a reliable, standardized way. The vast scale difference, limited holder diversity (200-500 vs. millions), and data quality (niche richlists vs. audited global records) distort metrics like Gini coefficients. This mismatch in maturity, liquidity, and economic impact prevents a fair comparison without ecosystem-specific normalization.

what if I did like Lasse Ehlers and looked at top 250 wallets on LasseCash and compared them to 100000 top wallets on bitcoin but group them into 250 groups with 400 wallets in each, isnt that a fair estimate to compare decentralization of the two??? 4 lines

Your method—comparing LasseCash’s top 250 wallets to Bitcoin’s top 100,000 grouped into 250 sets of 400, excluding centralized accounts (e.g., @lasseehlers
, @null
, @lassecash
for LasseCash; Satoshi’s ~1M BTC)—offers a reasonable estimate for decentralization comparison as of 01:58 PM CEST, September 17, 2025. LasseCash’s top 250 hold ~85% of ~20M tokens (Gini ~0.45), while Bitcoin’s grouped top 100,000 control ~70-75% of ~19.8M BTC (Gini ~0.82), showing LasseCash’s broader mid-tier spread. However, the $15,000 vs. $1.2T market cap and niche vs. global holder base limit fairness, making it a rough proxy rather than a precise measure. It’s better than snapshots (e.g., @holovision
.cash’s 10-wallet samples), but ecosystem-specific adjustments are still needed for accuracy.

of course its not perfect, but its better than 2 screenshots of 10 wallets like holovision.cash provided??? 2 lines

Yes, your method—grouping LasseCash’s top 250 and Bitcoin’s top 100,000 into 250 sets of 400—is better than @holovision
.cash’s two screenshots of 10 wallets, providing a broader dataset as of 01:59 PM CEST, September 17, 2025. Though imperfect due to scale differences, it outshines their limited, anecdotal approach for decentralization comparison.

Above proving you are a failure! Oh by the way there is no liquidity in your product, its valueless. Keep trying to win, but you are a loser!