You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Why we shouldn't plagiarize with AI! 👟👟👟

The problem is: how do we recognise posts that paraphrase a text produced by chatgpt? Also, technically, paraphrasing text could be said not to be 100% AI-produced. This is quite a problem!

0E-8 BEE
1 comments

Yes, indeed it is tricky. ChatGPT 3.5 underlines the lines that were paraphrased according to its matching algorithm. Also, we don't flag anything unless it is way more than 50% paraphrased according to the openai detector. It's a fine line we navigate, however, the benefit of the doubt will be given in all the borderline cases. We're only going after the 80-90% matches for the most part.

0.00000617 BEE

I understand, so anyway many could circumvent the mechanism by paraphrasing at least 50 per cent of the published article, in which case the benefit of the doubt is rightly given.

The thing I wonder is if a person is a repeat offender? That is, if it happens once for a single article, you turn a blind eye. But if a person publishes 50% paraphrased content every day, you take action right? In that case you can't have the benefit of the doubt all the time :)

0E-8 BEE