You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Booster Juicer

Rewards are earned two ways, author rewards and curation rewards. There are also Hive-Engine tokens, so when users vote on my post they also receive extra fun tokens when I vote on it. I have been around since the very beginning and have always done this, and there is nothing wrong with upvoting your own posts. Voting for your own comments however is excessive and would be silly. I have increased my voting power so that I distribute more rewards to the users who vote on my posts and I also upvote comments from people who are social and interact with my posts. Hive is a fun place and I like to share, and try to teach others how it works by example! !PIZZA Thanks for asking, have a great day!!

0E-8 BEE
1 comments

I am interested in your opinion about the difference between upvoting your own comments vs creating so many posts and upvoting them all too?

Examples...

A) 10 posts in a day, 0 comments, all 10 posts self-upvoted
B) 1 post a day, 10 comments on people, all 11 actions self-upvoted

vs

C) 1 post a day, 10 comments, zero self-upvotes

Which one you think it would be the most "fair" usage of your VESTS or staked token power (in case of Hive-Engine), that fairly draws tokens from the rewards pool?

I agree that "quantity" is key for the above behaviour. But then how will one consider "this is too much"? If the above example didn't spark what my point is trying to be, then multiply by 10x and I think you get the idea.

In a sense the resume is, if all the power of an account is curating an account own posts, is it really curating? 😎

0E-8 BEE