You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I just wonder why we label a follower of Islam when it comes to violence. There are hundrends of violent incidents happening around the globe. We never say XYZist attacked the critic.
If a person following certain faith attacks the other person for whatever reasons, we shouldn't be stating the matter as if the faith is the reason behind.
Yes, measures should be taken to stop violence, be it physical or psychological.
Because his motive for the offence was someone who cannot understand that we Europeans do not want Islam here and some warn against political Islam, because that is like Zionism.
So isn't it something that should be counted akin to racism? Though the Europeans haven't created an --ism term for such a mind-set.
What about those people eho target Muslims for being Muslims in different parts of the world? They are simply violent and not any --ist.
The thing is that followers of any leader or any religion may become extremist. It is the act that should be condemned and not the religion. Whoever commits a violence against any innocent person deserves the punishment. But it is pretty irresponsible to regard the whole demography of people responsible for this.
View more
You never hear Buddhism or christians doing suicide attacks or that kind of stuff, get over it and looks stats