You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: What does onboarding 10,000 active users look like?
- I didn't quite understand you, you speak in a convoluted way (did you want to say that InLeo is cheating?) If I got it wrong, correct me.
- So how should I act? If I need to check the commentator's account every time, then while there are few of them, it's not difficult. But then it becomes a waste of precious time - another solution is needed (I can't say which one).
0E-8 BEE
His main argument is pointing to community members of Hive and attributing their actions to the INLEO team and that we are "padding our numbers"
The funniest part is that this has nothing to do with our team, he's just assigning the narrative he wants to push.
INLEO has continued to innovate and build our platform in a way to outwardly attract new Hivers. He can shape whatever narrative he wants but any Hiver who wants to see the truth can just look at the INLEO Platform, our partnership with Dash and our upcoming partnerships with many other ecosystems.
We'll keep working our asses off to grow Hive. Mark can keep shouting on his soapbox.
I'd like to hear the answer themarkymark - (but I like the hype)
View more
Your metrics are "threads numbers", these activities directly inflate these metrics by such a large and drastic amount. Regardless of if it is your directive, it is still the case. 15% of the entire chain activity by one user which directly goes to your metric is not an abnormally you can ignore.
Regardless, it's a moot point as the overall stats show nothing has really changed, it's just a subsection of nonsense that should be address. Yet Hive Watchers continues to ignores, yet downvotes people using ai on a much smaller level for pennies. Whole different problem, interesting regardless.