You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Hive Engine Update - Transaction fees for bots
Human users will not be impacted.
Claiming that it doesn't affect users is complete false or lie or hypocrisy, or sign that you don't understand own platform, or just stupidity...
You just wrong. Obviously it affects all the apps and humans. Look how partial are your updates, like every time you write in future you going to make it better. This is sign that it's wrong direction, you do proper change not half change and act like you going to do follow ups to make it better, common, that's very weak, every few months you do change that breaks projects and fix nothing... I can already imagine how fast you improve it.
You just going to complicate process to the point that making projects with engine will be impossible. Generally my experience with engine is that you sabotage creators, devs, you don't care much, don't listen, act way too late, act blindly. How many times I can fix my project after you breaking it...
Imagine same changes applied to splinterlands, and users paying fees for transfering cards to other users? Users can transfer 20 cards every 3 second? All manually ? like transfering 200 cards to other players take 10 manual transactions every 3 seconds ? like users sits for few minutes and fill form every next block to do next transfer?
Is distribution of rewards like basic transfers affected too? Now I should distribute rewards to users by 500 single txes instead of doing few txes with 20 transactions?
how I explain this to my users that they need to pay extra fees for transfering nfts or buying nfts? How you print nfts to users as project? You pay fees twice to print nfts as creator?
How do you run custom bids for nfts market cause engine never did so, and we did for our projects an you kill it, so stupid...
It's all based on wrong assumptions...
Sad reality is that in last few years you did nothing for your users. You just wake up every few months to make it harder for users.
Few months ago I asked you to use engine power(close to 2M hive power) from staked users funds, for some delegations to engine projects so it's easier for them to exist and you completely ignored me while dropping 20$ votes on mooncart shit posts... It's worth to understand that supporting others do something good for platform, and it's not hard...
Maybe this extreme ignorance and hypocrisy is the reason why people attack your platform? You act likie you want me delete my app and attack your platform? I can. I can do some dirty actions next time you break my app and situation will get much more fun...
This was very long. I noted insults. I noted complaints. I noted villain-arc threats.
I didn't note helpful suggestions or requests.
Let's do this, when you're in an emotional spot where you can act professionally why don't you message me in Discord with suggestions or requests and I'll see what I can do.
2,264 characters isn’t long it actually reasonable detailed feedback, especially on a platform-changing update. That comment of yours above is dismissive and I'll point it out right here as is.
What @dcityrewards did was being thorough with his entire comment. Calling it long, while ignoring its substance, is a tactic often used to avoid engaging with hard truths. Which I aim to highlight in this comment.
No you didn't. Because there are no insulting remarks at all to note and I'll prove it. Harsh criticism and frustration he did show but not insulting at all.
dcityrewards wrote:
This attacks. For sure. But not the person. It attacks the idea. Throughout the entire comment he made absolutely no direct name calling, like calling you idiot or moron.
When he mentioned “stupidity” here, it was aimed at the decision or direction, not calling the dev(you and your small team) personally “stupid.” do notice the difference?
It sounds harsh but it isn't an insult.
Emotional it is. Who wouldn't be frustrated? But to dismiss his entire feedback the way you did is no sign of good leadership skills.
“You just going to complicate process…”
“You sabotage creators…”
“You don't care much, don't listen, act way too late, act blindly…”
These are harsh criticism, not insults. Neither is he ridiculing or mocking.
Criticism over platform behavior isn't insulting at the least.
When he wrote, "you don't understand your own platform", that was him criticizing competence. Not an insult.
He did give strong feedback as he showed accusation of ignoring and sabotaging projects. But that was not insulting either. All these are accusations about behavior, not personal insults like “you’re a moron” or “idiot.”
I didn't see any slurs, direct insults, no ad hominems, just frustration from someone who has had an app broken many times.
You dismiss his entire critic by calling "emotional" and "unprofessional".
while ignoring the core issues he raised, is exactly the kind of behavior that leads to these tensions in the first place. Maybe you should start to treat passionate feedback as a resource, instead of a threat.
He came giving honest grievances and you swiped it off rudely. Why are you being deflective?
The moment you reframe pain as a tantrum, you forfeit the chance to understand why someone’s bleeding in the first place.
Here’s a thought: Stop waiting for people to write like diplomats while their work burns. Instead, learn to listen when they speak from the ashes.
But I will say this about your own commentary response, @aggroed, to @dcityrewards.
When someone labels strong dissent as “insults” to avoid the substance of the criticism, it usually means one of several things is happening. It's either deflection, gaslighting the community, control of a narrative, emotional insecurity or failure of leadership.
Either way, calling it “insults” subtly tells everyone that, “this person isn’t worth listening to" and that is not fair at all to him nor to everyone else reading who is looking for solutions.
Avoiding the real issues by shifting the focus to tone instead of content, is a classic rhetorical move to not refute the argument, and discredit the messenger.
Thank you.