You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: [ENG/DEU] Anniversary! CryptoCompany Is 3 Years Old Today! Thank You! You Made It Possible! Let's Rock On!
Thanks for not looking to waste time, appreciate that a lot especially after some recent events.
My concern is that your project mainly votes for accounts burning your project's token in exchange for a vote thus unfairly affecting others who may be deserving of votes in different forms that hive's curation is meant to work in - effort, quality, consumption, networking, etc.
This form is considered selling votes, your project benefits from the curation methods in more ways than just having people post about your project and you receiving 50% of the rewards in curation but also taking some value from hive to prop up supply scarcity of your token through curation. Buying profitable votes (I didn't check if they are profitable) means easy guaranteed returns for authors, just because they're not posting abuse that @hivewatchers gets involved in and may get them blacklisted from them and yourself doesn't mean the votes are fairly earned if they have to pay for them with the layer 2 token.
If everyone launched such schemes we'd be taking more and more value away from curation and artificially propping up layer 2 token evaluations at the cost of hive and proof of brain. If others don't launch such schemes you're unfairly earning more than them because of these programs of voting for accounts who burn your token. Hive doesn't benefit from this activity but it's hive curation you're utilizing to make it work.
I assume that I have understood the content of your statement.
So that we are talking about the same things and there are no misunderstandings, let me confirm and deny a few things.
Yes, the service exchanges votes for CCD tokens.
I agree with you that “effort, quality, consumption, networking, etc.” should be a requirement. The rules for using the service are designed accordingly - and I regularly reject votes (or requests for them) if the orders/postings do not meet these requirements. I have even reported accounts to HiveWatchers on several occasions if I suspect scam or abuse behind the vote-orderers, or I actively participate in detecting them by providing information or expressing suspicions, for example. So we are both pulling in the same direction.
I don't know if you have read the rules on the page https://cryptocompany.ceo/voter.php in the “Restrictions” tab. If not, that's okay, there's a lot of information on the page. Let me show you the rules again here as a screenshot.
I am reluctant to disagree strongly, but:
The HP behind CryptoCompany are not only used for votes within the requested service. I generally vote for nice or supportable content. So I can certainly address your concerns and warn you: “Everything is in the green zone”.
I see it differently. Quite the opposite, in fact, if we're talking about regulated services that act in good faith. Yes, there are projects that attribute value to every (own) secondary account - I don't want to name names right now so as not to discredit anyone.
So it seems to me, if we clear up any misunderstandings, that we have quite similar views; I'm glad about that!
Can I answer any further questions or help you in any way?
In every case enjoy your day & make the best out of it!
(Oh, I forgot at the last answer... Sorry about...:)
View more