You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: SEED Holdings Report #22 - Project owned HBD/SEED liquidity & more updates
Think about it this way.
You hold seed and all 3 months for example you receive more seed tokens to bring it back to 1$.
In terms you don't want to sell, nothing changes.
But in terms to issue more tokens, it's a really good sales pitch.
More funds allow empo to invest in more things.
With a "presale" empo doesn't need to face the changing price issue.
If new tokens are released for example "3$", price can go up to 4$ and it sucks for empo.
If there is a date in the future for token issuing, it would allow exactly defining the worth on date x.
Everything else is really complex in terms of expansion.
Sure that would be some work too but would allow expansion more easily.
Another thing is, maybe some people want to sell the new tokens.
At the end of the day, it could be a way to generate more value.
the point was more to show empo some ideas.
When you believe it's the number of tokens that is a thing, then you are right. Then I think, why not 10ct tokens instead of 1$. But yea, can be any figure, also 1$.
However, I don't think the new tokens issued in your scenario will drive peeps to sell them. I think for the top holders, holding the majority of the tokens, the investment into SEED is a small part of their total crypto/investment, hence they hodl, as everyone would do when believing the project is good. Other factors for hodl-ing may play a role as well, like the top-level subscription to makerDAO. But you may be right when many more tokens in the market, with new investors, a bit more trading may be the result, though I really doubt it. I have the 'feeling' some of the existing investors will buy more SEED rendering the effort to no real net result 😂
Here is an idea: When Empo offers like 2 to 3x current value for SEED, I can imagine that will drive some peeps to sell 😜
More seriously: Giving more incentives for peeps to enter the liquidity pool may help as well.
View more