You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Signalling for 20% HBD interest
@smooth73
(edited)It's a little sketchy but supposedly a foundation that will benefit the chain. We will see.
I like the decentralized model better in most cases. For example, we could also buy other assets to serve as secondary backing/stabilizing, but it would have to be a proposal approved through DHF, with suitable safeguards (multisig, limited budget, etc.). A foundation basically run by one guy, eh, could work, but...
0.01921166 BEE
I agree. But that's more theory.
If the chain itself could control wallets, yes that would be good. But I don't know any way this could work. And if billions are controlled by a group of people, I mean, we are in crypto and know it better.
I think Luna Itself will blow up to an unstable tether version. So if big enough, it could start hammering things to zero ( not zero, but damage the market).
If peg from TUSD should not hold, we see panic.
If peg holds and bear market happens, Luna dies because of inflation.
I mean we know it better from hive.
We could know all agree nobody sells up hive hits 100$.
creating a bazillion HBD ( + 20% hype).
creating protocols/pools for trading HBD to other stable coins, supporting the peg with DAO fund.
At some point, funds are not enough to support the peg and it breaks.
I think this happens to terra this cycle.
Btw, do you know a way to short it without risking the collateral? :D
View more