You are viewing a single comment's thread:
RE: Over $14,000 USD worth of Hive & HBD burned in February
Probably worth mentioning there's no real need for others to create their own HIVE/HBD burn posts, flooding the feeds with burn posts. You're providing that option. No need to "compete" for burn post votes.
Also, there's a far more valuable and productive approach to describing the "stakeholders can only curate" option. Elsewhere on the internet, paying supporters can support their interests. They can do that here as well. Tapping into that market and framing things in a way they understand would be far more productive and valuable to this ecosystem. As an example: People don't purchase Bits on Twitch in order to "curate" content.
Anyway. That's a story for another day...
0E-8 BEE
100% agree. I’ve been asked a few times about this. I also only post one a day and 11 comments under it so it doesn’t take up spots on trending.
I have one question. What's more beneficial in the long run? Is it worth including the HBD or would 100% power up posts be the way to go? Or does it amount to an equal benefit?
View more
Good that he just does it through comments below, in order to not occupy the trending.
I also agree that if these rewards would have been used in incentivizing low paid authors, that also may have mattered.
I agree his approach makes sense and doesn't cause interference in any way.
As for paying people more for simply showing up and creating content. In most cases I tend to disagree with that being beneficial. I'd rather see capable and interesting content creators attracting paying supporters organically, on their own, much like you'd see in the Twitch example I provided. Majority earn very little and often nothing, yet Twitch doesn't fail. Content creators know and accept the fact they won't get paid just for showing up. They work to build an audience consisting of some paying supporters.
View more