You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Instead of answers two Ignore - Statt Antworten zwei Ignore

I meant that the $100 would be more than enough for servers.

It doesn't fit that it is said that the pool is milked with the lottery, but here over 100k HBD per year are pulled out. It is out of proportion.

It would be like the state hiring tax collectors for 1 billion who end up collecting 100 million. Makes no sense at all.

And take a look at the two links in my post yesterday. I'm not sure about one of them yet, but the other one, if you think about it, is not right at all and not in the interests of the community. And also copy past or recycling, which would be worth a downvote!

And what is not taken into consideration is that downvoting posts, like kryptodenno's, also harms those who love to see his posts and therefore participate and vote voluntarily.

I don't know who, when and where decided that this type of post is not ok. Apparently a lot of people want it though and you can see from the clear vote result of almost 100% so far that HW is not doing a good job.

Thanks for taking the time to write about it, by the way.

!LUV !PGM !invest_vote

0.00668803 BEE
2 comments

cwow2, mein-senf-dazu sent you LUV. 🙂 (1/5) tools | trade | connect | wiki | daily

Made with LUV by crrdlx.

0E-8 BEE

Yes, properly 100$ would be enough for servers.
Alternative it can properly be runned via a witness server and then you just pay a fee for the server use.

I dont know about the Kryptodenno thing. As I have also said, HW isn't perfect but we lack an alternative xD

I don't think it harms the people wanted to see his posts. Because I can shitpost all I want and someone can claim they want to see shitposts, doesn't mean I should get paid for it x)

And who decides what posts to get downvoted? Well, the people who do the downvoting is deciding that.
The issue is HW getting funded, if it was just a big account downvoting Kryptodenno, they could do it simple because they didn't like his posts.

0E-8 BEE