
LeoStrategy's team is currently building:
There is another element to our roadmap which we planned to add later. With the current market conditions, we have shifted our tune and believe that adding it sooner than later would be massively beneficial to the entire LeoStrategy economy we are building.
LeoStrategy is a permanent-capital vehicle. Our mission is to deliver useful products and services to the market while generating accretive capital to purchase $LEO and permanently stake it on our balance sheet. When we buy LEO (which we do every single day), that LEO is permanently staked for sLEO on our balance sheet and earns USDC from LeoDex's affiliate fees (and soon; LeoKit as well).
LeoStrategy is accelerating the rollout of its RWA Conversion & Balance Sheet Facility (RCBF) to strengthen peg dynamics for its synthetic RWAs (TTSLA, TGLD, TNVDA), unlock two-sided trading, and materially increase protocol profitability.
The RCBF introduces a conversion backstop that enables fast arbitrage:
This mechanism is capped, disciplined, and accretive by design. Conversion is a backstop, not a primary execution path. Its existence tightens pegs, increases trading volume, and makes sRWAs actively tradable rather than passive yield instruments.
Net result:
RCBF was always part of the long-term roadmap. Based on live market data, LeoStrategy believes deploying it sooner rather than later will materially strengthen the entire ecosystem. The model is being introduced as a draft policy, with small-scale beta testing planned to validate behavior in real market conditions.
Let's start with the Why. Convertibility on the LeoStrategy RWAs is an incredibly important aspect of the economy. Convertibility creates a two-way street for LeoStrategy's Synthetic RWAs (sRWAs).
sRWAs are designed to synthetically track and underlying:
The pairs are designed to track these underlyings primarily through rate policy. The rate policy is completely transparent, onchain and predictable. You can see the hourly Threads published by @ttsla.yield, @tgld.yield and @tnvda.yield who post the deviation & correlation of these tokens to their synthetically correlated underlyings.
Right now, the only way to arbitrage these pegs is to buy them when they deviate and wait. You get paid extra yield based on the correlation deviation. By waiting, you simply collect high yields until the pegs eventually catch up. This creates a bit of buy pressure to push the sRWAs toward their peg price.
Some things are best seen in a live environment. The yield-based peg dynamics are moving too slow relative to the underlyings. As we mentioned at the start of this post, there are two drivers that are making the deviation higher:
With TSLA, GLD and NVDA ripping higher while BTC has dropped -20% and altcoins even more than that, we are seeing the deviation of TTSLA, TGLD and TNVDA getting wider.
They will eventually reach peg parity solely from the rate policy. We are confident about this. The rate policy drives long-term demand as the predictable rates lead to demand for higher yields. Many economies operate in a very similar fashion.
This creates slow arb on the peg. The conversion facility we designed was going to be released later in 2026 but now we are consider releasing it sooner and seeing how it performs in a live environment.
The goal? To create fast arb on the pegs. This fast arb will lead to pegs being tighter which will have some important downstream effects:
When you zoom out, you will see that this RCBF feature will result in:
✅ Tightly correlated pegs for LeoStrategy sRWAs
✅ More Trading Activity on sRWAs
✅ More Market Maker Profits on sRWAs
✅ Less Yield Obligations for LeoStrategy = More Profit We Keep to Buy Additional LEO
✅ More Success on Existing + Future Launches From Increased Confidence
As we said at the start of this, we designed this during the initial design phase of sRWAs. We made some adjustments now that we've seen the sRWAs performing live in the real world. This is very important data that we've been collecting to ensure we can continue improving our model.
LeoStrategy is NOT a static project. We are constantly evolving and improving our approach. Remember our mission statement is to provide useful products and services to the market while generating accretive capital to purchase $LEO and perma-stake it on our balance sheet. Constantly improving our tokens, products and services is core to this mission statement.
This is a draft policy which means this is the initial draft. We are looking for feedback on this and we are also internally continuing to improve this model.
We are proposing this model today, asking for your feedback and intending to run some small beta tests of the conversion feature in the coming days and weeks. The small beta tests will effectively allow us to do RCBF operations in small doses to see how the market reacts.
Purpose:
The RWA Conversion & Balance Sheet Facility (“RCBF”) is a rule-based mechanism through which LeoStrategy may issue LSTR to acquire our own tokenized real-world assets (“RWAs”) at a discount-to-correlation value.
Users get to convert sRWAs to LSTR and then sell the LSTR for USD (or HODL the LSTR).
LeoStrategy purchases those sRWAs using LSTR equity at a slight discount to peg price via the haircut mechanisms.
The facility exists to:
Eligible assets are LeoStrategy-sRWAs (TTSLA, TGLD and TNVDA) as well as SURGE (Fixed-Income Convertible Bond).
The rollout plan would be:
To start, the RCBF would activate in specified epochs. For example, we would announce TTSLA conversions are eligible this week. As we test, refine and improve the model it will trend toward being a full-time conversion feature (convert any time, anywhere on any sRWA).
This is designed to allow us to strategically scale the model.
The RCBF is structurally aligned with LeoStrategy’s primary profit center: cross-chain market making on assets it issues.
By enforcing a credible peg corridor:
This increase in two-sided trading directly enhances market-making profitability. Market-maker profits, in turn, reinforce the system through $LEO purchases which bolster our balance sheet and further over-collateralize the asset stack upstream.
This creates a positive feedback loop between peg stability, revenue generation and the growth of $LEO on our balance sheet.
The secondary market is intended to be the primary driver of trading for sRWAs. The conversion route allows arbitrage to flow. Think of it like a pressure valve. Sometimes, you need to let pressure build in the system and other times you need to allow that pressure to escape to create more room for positive system activity.
LeoStrategy's RCBF is much like a pressure valve. We use it as needed to let pressure stay in the system or release pressure from the system. The gauge for when we decide to use it and how much pressure we decide to dissipate is based on the correlation of assets. Allowing us to dynamically adjust the correlation of sRWAs to ensure that they trade in lock-step with their underlyings.
This dynamic is quite similar to HBD's conversion feature. The majority of hiveans don't use the conversion feature of HBD. Instead, arbitragers use the conversion feature and the average hivean actually buys/sells HBD on the open market.
RCBF for LeoStrategy's assets will work in a very similar dyanmic: most people will simply use the open market to buy/sell. Some arbitragers will use the conversion feature. The arbitragers create the tight market dynamics that allow open market (secondary market) dynamics to play out successfully for everyone else. This is how most markets work.
Another great example is USDT: have you ever actually converted USD to USDT or vice versa?
Probably not. But if we asked you if you ever bought or sold USDT, 99% of readers would say yes. The conversion feature maintains the peg for the secondary market users to seamlessly flow in and out of the asset.
These properties ensure that market participants prefer trading and arbitrage over conversion whenever possible. The conversion facility exists to anchor expectations and absorb excess supply only when market forces alone are insufficient.
Conversions are priced using a market-clearing model:
Haircut behavior:
The haircut compensates for balance-sheet risk, seniority compression, and LSTR dilution.
With the correct mechanisms in place: LSTR issued to purchase sRWAs ONLY HAPPENS if it is ACCRETIVE to LSTR holders. This means that LSTR is used to buy sRWAs at a discount to the correlation peg.
This creates a win-win scenario for arbitragers & LSTR holders:
When a conversion occurs, LSTR is issued to the arbitrager who converted the sRWA. This LSTR is issued as Staked LSTR in their wallet (sLSTR).
This LSTR is sent to their Hive-Engine wallet (or Base Wallet when we release it on that side) as staked LSTR.
Similar to all Hive-Engine tokens, you can either leave it staked or you can unstake it back to liquid LSTR.
Since there are no staking rewards for LSTR, most arbitragers are likely to instantly unstake the LSTR.
We propose an unstaking time of 7 days with a daily payout. This means that if someone converts 10 TTSLA to 7 LSTR (for example), they will get 7 staked LSTR sent to their wallet on Hive-Engine.
Then, the user can unstake the 7 LSTR. For 7 days, they will get 1/7th of the total unstake amount (in this case, 1 LSTR per day for 7 days = 7 LSTR unstaked).
By introducing this unstake window, we allow conversions to be spread over a number of days as opposed to instantaneous. This prevents gamification of the LSTR price and bolsters point #5 above (using conversions as a backstop, not primary execution path: the average user should see conversions as being delayed gratification as opposed to going to the market to buy/sell).
The RCBF owns the sRWAs permanently in its treasury wallet. These sRWAs are set to LSTR as their yield preference. This means that any sRWAs converted are permanently off the market + earning LSTR yield into the treasury wallet. Creating buyback pressure on the LSTR token while raising the claimable value for all LSTR holders (accretive).
Parameters for the RCBF are subject to change. This is a draft of the model and we are continuing to refine it. Once the RCBF feature goes live, we are always capable of tweaking and improving the model.
The RCBF is distinct from:
Instead, the RCBF establishes a market-enforced peg corridor supported by disciplined balance-sheet deployment, combining flexibility with credibility.
In other words: the RCBF combines the best of both worlds: you get flexible issuance that only happens when its accretive to LSTR holders while giving peg credibility and profits to sRWA holders.
In a mature state:
The RCBF is designed to make itself progressively less necessary as market confidence increases. When it is necessary, there is a win-win model for the RCBF & sRWA converters:
Key risks include:
These risks are mitigated through issuance caps, dynamic pricing, asset-specific exposure limits, and conservative balance-sheet deployment.
In other words: by having a strict policy around how the RCBF operates to ensure that every conversion is accretive to LSTR holders we ensure that our bases are covered and these risks are nullified.
Posted Using INLEO
I like the theory behind the proposal. My question is: could a much simpler, quicker to market model be just as effective?
Simply placing a large buy order on the market at peg - 5%, and a sell order at peg + 5% would have a similar effect? Traders will arb the pool prices bringing balance between these prices and the orderbook. Bot can adjust these prices in real time using the RWA price. Investors have some price certainty, and a much simpler model to understand. LSTR benefits from the 10% spread, and can use now token issuance to set the +5% sell order - raising capital.
Am I missing something? Seems an easier way to achieve the same goal.
I certainly like the simplicity of the idea.
This is an interesting idea and it's possible we could do this for some amount of the conversions (effectively a subset)
There are some reasons a more direct conversion process is useful. Also, much of this will be handled by our UI.
In the doc above, its mentioned that the RCBF should be seen more as a "buyer of last resort" when it comes to conversions
The secondary market / arbitragers should be doing exactly what you described above. We want the free market to do this as opposed to LeoStrategy.
Instead of LeoStrategy doing this, arbitragers can confidently buy/sell around the peg. This healthy secondary market actually leads to direct profits for LeoStrategy (via our Market Makers).
In terms of conversions, LeoStrategy merely offering the conversions with a haircut will give the market confidence + breathing room to self-correct. Right now, the only thing maintaining the pegs is anyone who trusts LeoStrategy will continue to pay the yield.
Since you hold a lot of RWAs, its clear you trust this. We obviously know that we will continue with yield in perpetuity.
But your average arbitrager/user may not trust this (yet, but trust grows with time). Instead of solely relying on this, adding the conversion mechanism releases some pressure from the system and allows the pegs to more quickly correlate to the underlying. This doesn't mean that all RWAs will suddenly convert. We actually expect conversions to be infrequent. Similar to our USDT example in the post above: most users will never use conversions. Those who do will use the secondary market to be active participants (HE order books, pools, etc.) to actively arb the pegs and create the exact effect you outlined above.
We hope this answer covers what you're asking. We love your outside the box thinking, please keep feedback like this coming. 🦁
Congratulations @leostrategy! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 50000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts:
I did a conversion of SURGE a few days ago. Can you do the issuance of sLSTR when you have time? https://he.dtools.dev/@rcbf