You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Delegating alone doesn't directly give people higher votes. Only if people are manually curated, they get a higher vote. If that's your problem, we can get that additional perk removed from the curation. We know about your contributions in POSH, engagement, and curation efforts. It is not that your curators alone do a selfless job; we have a similar set of curators in our community as well, doing selfless jobs. At least you pay them from the reward pool through some mechanism. We don't even do that.
I've asked you many times to reconsider these layer 2 token delegation reports
We don't understand how 2 is many. This is the second time you are mentioning this as a problem, and that too with proper words. So far, the message was only conveyed through downvotes, which is why the message was not clear to the community. If LEO or any Layer 2 token update is your issue, and the weekly $1-$2 earnings from that post are your concern, then we can definitely stop posting that content. The small reward we earned on those posts helped us pay the server bills.
In the future, it will be nice and helpful if communications with the community or some representatives of the community are made before directly attacking them. We are not your enemies, and we don't have to attack each other. We have also been here for over 7 years on this chain and are trying our puny efforts for community building.
You may be doing big, big things for Hive, but we are a very small community trying to build with our small capacity. The market is already reducing the motivation for many people, and if elephants keep stamping on the small ants who are trying to build a small colony, the remaining motivation will also be gone. We don't need support from elephants, which we never had; it will be helpful at least if the stamping is not happening. Thanks for understanding.
If these things are left unchecked and properly not conveyed how serious of an issue they are, they'll grow uncontrollably all over the ecosystem to continously damage it. If it's not too much rewards then please don't accept them on such posts, it's easy to forfeit them through beneficiaries.
Manual curators being picky about who gets bigger upvotes based on self-interest is the same as autovoting people if they're delegating your way or holding some tokens of yours. Using layer 1 curation to prop up the value of layer 2 tokens is against hive curation, I know you're not excessive in that regard but it's still unfair towards other curation projects and stakeholders that focus on everything else that should be important in curation rather than self-interest.
View more