RE: Is the concept of ‘valuable content’ subjective?

Cheers for the excellent reply!

I'm really happy to see that we do have stakeholders here that care.

There are many intangibles that go into making a community a thriving and vibrant place---some good, some bad

I do agree.

All that matters from an ad revenue perspective is traffic.

And having a vibrant community of people doing different things is certainly going to contribute to return visitors.

Hopefully moving the revenue needle over the longer term.

But I still stand by the fact that the most effective way to drive the price of LEO up, at least in the short term, is for those with stake to incentivise SEO structured content.

Lots of the highest paid authors here can write.

They just need to be financially incentivised into writing the type of content that will drive the most traffic and therefore help price.

Heck, they should be on board because their salary goes up!

---

PS. I see you've been linking to the Hive LeoGlossary page that wants to target the keyword 'what is hive'.

That's a super tough keyword because its so generic, but when you add words to the end of it like crypto, we actually already rank.

(Google 'what is hive crypto').

By now continuously trying to tell Google that it should be instead prioritising this younger, less authoritative version, we're doing more harm than good.

This is called 'cannibalisation' in SEO because we already rank and now we're just eating our own ranking haha.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta