You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Blurt is just weird

(edited)

It's one thing to put a lot of time into a post and if you feel no one voted it or appreciated it to then upvote, nothing wrong with that. Some could even selfvote after 24h to give their curators and supporters some extra ROI on their votes as a thanks. Just saying what he said about selfvotes only gives abusers, votetraders and maximizers a reason to shitpost and be against downvotes turning this place into a proof of stake shitchain like steem has become where there is close to no genuine curation happening and literal shit posts by the same people on trending daily farming it to the ground.

0.00000742 BEE
1 comments
(edited)

Because the ecosystem allows to self vote, I can't argue about its being right or wrong. However, personally I don't feel it an act of high morality.

Just saying what he said about selfvotes only gives abusers, votetraders and maximizers a reason to shitpost and be against downvotes turning this place into a proof of stake shitchain

That's another important point. If self post is allowed backed by self- love and self- value, the spammers would have equal right to upvote themselves.

0E-8 BEE