"How would a better system works in your mind?"
Personally I am averse to 51% of voters spending the money of the 49% that voted no. Hive could account the DHF differently because those that vote to disburse funds from the DHF could spend only their share of it, while those that vote against proposals would maintain their share of the DHF, because we can calculate those values and treat those funds differently. We are not limited to the technologies available in the Enlightenment during which IRL democracies were founded. This would enable the profligate to spend their share of the Founder's Stake away without a care in the world, while the prudent could keep their share for substantive purposes.
@themarkymark may have the requisite skill to code such differentiation. I only know such calculation is mathematically potential.
I don't think the system will ever change to a pure majority only voting system. The reality is most people don't have much stake and most don't vote on top of that.
View more