You are viewing a single comment's thread:

RE: Rethinking Hive author rewards: How can we improve the distribution of rewards?

I have seen the rumble on this issue for a time now, and I have some ideas of my own. I think part of the problem is that many small and new users (voilà, comme moi) hope to make big user "notice them", and to some extent I think that is the wrong mindset, it is just not gonna work, big users notice their friends who are also big users (that is as a statistical trend, I mean).

Big accounts have concerns befitting their size, not in the sense of big concerns, but in the sense of their size determining what is relevant to them. So, red fishes and other small ones should take some things into their hands, yet they are trapped into a mentality were everything must come from bigger swimmers.

My point is we need more modest and small kind of initiatives, I am maturing mine right now, need to round some corners yet.

0E-8 BEE
1 comments

I think part of the problem is that many small and new users (voilà, comme moi) hope to make big user "notice them"

I agree with you on this. And I think that is why you see so much interaction under blogs from the larger stakeholders. They have the change of an upvote and maybe even a follow.

So, red fishes and other small ones should take some things into their hands, yet they are trapped into a mentality were everything must come from bigger swimmers.

That is actually what Alex-rourke says with his "Orca's unite". But how do you unite the redfish. Together they have a lot of stake, but maybe they should use it to upvote other redfish.

0E-8 BEE

For the time being I'm coordinating a protect aimed to increase the visibility of smaller users who put up good content, we cannot generate a significative upvotes but we can (i hope so) increase somewhat their visibility. The idea is still being discussed but we hope to have it up and running soon.

0.00009877 BEE