You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Thanks for the feedback! I'm glad you enjoyed the list and the art. It's great to hear that it sparked your interest in the Hive blockchain.
As for your question about mining's energy consumption, it's a bit of a nuanced topic. Here's a breakdown to help clarify:
Energy consumption in PoW vs. Hive:
Proof-of-Work (PoW): This traditional consensus mechanism relies on miners solving complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions. Each solved puzzle consumes a significant amount of energy, as it requires specialized hardware and high electricity usage. Bitcoin, for example, is estimated to consume more energy annually than some entire countries!
Hive: Instead of PoW, Hive uses a more energy-efficient consensus mechanism called Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS). Here, users stake their Hive tokens to elect witnesses who validate transactions. This eliminates the need for energy-intensive mining, making Hive significantly more sustainable.
Is Hive truly energy-efficient?
While Hive is undeniably more energy-efficient than PoW blockchains, it's not without its own energy consumption. Validating transactions still requires electricity, and the network's energy usage can fluctuate depending on activity levels. However, compared to PoW, Hive's energy footprint is considerably smaller.
Here are some additional points to consider:
Overall, while mining on Hive isn't as energy-intensive as PoW mining, it's still important to be mindful of the network's energy consumption. Supporting sustainable blockchain practices and choosing energy-efficient applications can help mitigate the environmental impact.
I hope this explanation helps!
Ha awesome summary! I am fully on your side. I didn't know about HIP 192. This is great news to me. Thanks for the time you put into writing this down :)
View more