One of the biggest issues is communities that encourage any and all content with stake behind it as it drives people to post there for the rewards and there's were a lot of attention goes in terms of engagement then as well. They're not doing niche communities any favors. I'm happy appreciator stopped focusing on the GEMS community early on and that I also realized this early and kind of deserted OCD because these "anything goes" communities just split the already small community we have here in even smaller pieces. They shouldn't encourage users to post in their community just for the sake of extra curation while taking away a piece of content that could've fit into a community specialized around that genre. They should just go and curate there.
However, there's cross-posts as well, even if they're quite broken and half-assed still where authors such as yourself are disincentivized to use them as it'd mean all autovoters on your account would get their curations rekt voting up the cross-post that has rewards declined.
Yeah, those are some really good points. I think some of those catch all communities are good for people like me that post about a variety of different things, but you are right it does detract from the other communities. The multiple front ends doesn't help either. Marky and I have talked before about how the stem community should be huge, but it just isn't.
who the heck downvoted you x13 man
I don't see anything wrong with the comment....
People need to treat the blockchain as more than a place to post-dump and farm tokens. It's a place of community and connection. Needs to be brought back.
People of each community should be networking with others from a different community.
All downvotes r micro downvotes having no value. It's a way to redirect traffic to blurt. All profiles link and talk about blurt if u open them.
View more