You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Shut up
Everyone can do with their HP how they like - that is a fact
They can circlejerk and others can downvote them for that.
Just because they have the HP, THEY ARE FREE TO DO WITH THEIR HP
SO AS THE GERMANS ONLY CIRCLEJERK
And try to VERBIETEN bigger accounts to flag that?
So you support censorship of big investors?
DO YOU WANT TO KILL HIVE ?
(I am only asking these dumb questions, cuz you asked me them - it is part of the reflection)
Bye
That's just chaos. The law of the jungle, and has no potential to create a functional society - which I reckon the present state of Hive demonstrates well. That's what's been killing Hive instead of enabling it to outcompete highly censored and propaganda spewing Big Social Media. That's the problem. If the code enables it, it's all ethical and productive, right? Except the code also permits scams and sniffers to snag exposed keys, so by your standards those things should be just fine too.
There need to be rules that restrict individual freedom in society in order for society to be anything other than a cannibal holocaust. Hive needs to rationally secure free speech or remain redolent of the stench of censorship it reeks of across the cryptosphere now. Even Reddit has more users. Opinion flags that have driven ~1M users off the platform - which is more than 100x the users presently on board - glaringly reveal an almost suicidal level of self-harm to the platform from censorship. It's hard to conceive of worse management performance of a social media platform, particularly one that introduced getting paid by curators to blog just as social media was becoming the largest financial sector in global markets.
Frankly, I have to suspend disbelief to think it isn't deliberate suppression.
View more