You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It's a good analysis, but it has certain biases. While laziness certainly plays a role, there's also the problem of access to knowledge. For example, I was researching a topic for a book only available in English on Amazon. I couldn't buy it online because in my country (Venezuela has restrictions) it wasn't available even in pirated form since it was out of print, and it was important. So I asked an AI about certain concepts, and they did have the information I was looking for. The point is, one might say that seeking information from an AI makes people lazy, but what happens when you don't have legal access to the knowledge you need? What happens when you face restrictions you can't circumvent in any other way?
It's very easy to tell a researcher to continue using old methods when they can access specialized, paid websites, and you don't even have enough money to buy groceries. It's also easy to judge someone who uses AI-generated images when they can't afford a graphic designer precisely because of financial limitations. And the list goes on. It's not just about convenience and time, but also about accessibility and cost.AI is used not just out of laziness, but because it allows you to learn about things that aren't easily accessible online, translates texts into your local language, and can synthesize complex concepts.
In conclusion, the growth in AI use is multifaceted and is tailored to each individual's circumstances and budget.